Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
debernardis's Avatar
Posts: 2,142 | Thanked: 2,054 times | Joined on Dec 2006 @ Sicily
#31
Originally Posted by qole View Post
(typed on the screen of my N800 -- in 180 degree rotated left-handed mode in Tear <both community-developed projects>-- on my new, hand-built back deck )
I - have - to - see - this Please photo
__________________
Ernesto de Bernardis

 
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#32
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
One thing about opensource developments though, it's not user\customer driven.
Sorry ? What gave you that idea (especially seeing all the feature requests and responses in various t.m.o. threads) ? It's not any less user-driven than any other software.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#33
Originally Posted by qole View Post
Hey silvetmountain, how much did you pay for your N810? I'm guessing about $200?

What other devices with roughly similar functionality are available in that price range?
iPhone on contract.

Archos 7 - as of today on 1 Sale A Day.

iPaq 2210 with CF wifi.

Give me time... I'll think of a few others.

If you feel that you can find a device with a similar range of software, with more polish and professionalism in the apps, then, seriously, buy it.
I had, I did, I enjoyed them. However, let's be honest. To say something as such, it lacks professionalism itself. The apps that were created by pros, they're far and few in-between. And not updated at all.

The community sourced apps are great. But they're not polished.

At all. And apathy, patience, compassion, and other emotions don't solve jack either. Name something you've paid almost $400 for - I was there on day one - that withered down to community sourced apps that lacked polish, updates and support.

You'd feel rather damn let down too. That's my experience. And asking devs on this site - you'll likely get shot down if you don't fall into lockstep with the other moderators with huge *** chips on their shoulders and bow down when you post. Simply put, asking for updates, asking for support, asking for things on this board yields very little other than attitude in most cases.

I fear it'll only get worse.

As for me, my experience is the opposite of yours. My tablet is like a Christmas present that I get to keep unwrapping, month after month, year after year.
We differ markedly.

The community developers keep surprising me with unexpected gifts; I keep finding new ways to use this astonishing little thing; and mostly the devs are helpful and friendly.
Besides Tear, DialCentral, the HomeApps... what else could you be referring to?

Zerojay has an excellent point. Ask not what the developers can do for you! Ask what you can do for the developers!
Been there, done that. Asked about a wifi radar way back in 2007. Felt like I got booed off stage.

I've asked for video for the camera via RT Comm. Same feeling... "Who needs it? I don't. Your needs aren't like mine."

Last edited by gerbick; 2009-08-15 at 07:51.
 
qole's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#34
sorry for the double post, but I just realized there's a bit of a misunderstanding here. I was rereading the first post and I noticed that silvermountain said that one of the solutions to the problem is to share the code of projects that are deemed important.

But silvermountain, if they aren't sharing the code, then the app isn't free at all! Free isn't failing there, they're failing at free!

Open source requires shared code. That's the very core of open source. That's what open source means.

When I reread your original post as a request to make more projects truly open source, because without shared source we can't take over when a dev leaves, I go from disagreeing with you to agreeing with you 100%. We need to ensure that the good Maemo apps are made open source, to avoid 'dead' apps.
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to qole For This Useful Post:
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#35
Originally Posted by qole View Post
sorry for the double post, but I just realized there's a bit of a misunderstanding here. I was rereading the first post and I noticed that silvermountain said that one of the solutions to the problem is to share the code of projects that are deemed important.

But silvermountain, if they aren't sharing the code, then the app isn't free at all! Free isn't failing there, they're failing at free!

Open source requires shared code. That's the very core of open source. That's what open source means.

When I reread your original post as a request to make more projects truly open source, because without shared source we can't take over when a dev leaves, I go from disagreeing with you to agreeing with you 100%. We need to ensure that the good Maemo apps are made open source, to avoid 'dead' apps.
Aw crap... I went from disagreeing with you to also agreeing - but I went by your original post.

Agreed. There's some code that wasn't made fully open. But YellowNotes and DialCentral were... and look at how much those are great now.
 
MicroChip123's Avatar
Posts: 78 | Thanked: 10 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ England
#36
One of the main reasons why i have an Internet Tablet not an Ipod touch is that all software apart from 1 is free (maps is kinda not free).

I feel that having all the software free for the Internet tablets has been vital for its success.
__________________
N810
OS2008
8GB Memory Card
 

The Following User Says Thank You to MicroChip123 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 356 | Thanked: 231 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#37
Discussion steered away from that topic but i'd like to return there.

Few years ago many people (especially in floss world) had a big laugh when certain fat man danced a monkey dance chanting 'developers, developers'.

But you know? He is right. When you make developers happy they will create more, better applications. And I think Nok finally is getting it. Ovi store should make it easier to monetize for programmers on their work (I hope there will be maemo section); move to 'Qt everywhere' strategy which should make market bigger.
er.
er.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to vvaz For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#38
Originally Posted by vvaz View Post
But you know? He is right. When you make developers happy they will create more, better applications. And I think Nok finally is getting it. Ovi store should make it easier to monetize for programmers on their work (I hope there will be maemo section); move to 'Qt everywhere' strategy which should make market bigger.
er.
er.
Ah, story of the happy developer. I can tell you from experience that commercial is the least happy developer arena. Nobody cares what YOU like or think, if you're sick, if you don't agree, or simply you invested too much time or money into it, went bankrupt, had family issues or whatnot. The user paid 25$ to see you dance and dance you must. Sure, there are star developers who got rich and under spotlights, but then again, who talks about the horde of unsuccessful commercial developers or their apps ? When they go into the pit of abandonment, they take their apps with them and it's like they never existed, along with their Ballmer style 'happiness'.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
hhedberg's Avatar
Posts: 84 | Thanked: 212 times | Joined on Nov 2007 @ Oulu, Finland
#39
Originally Posted by lma View Post
I disagree. Free/Open projects typically have bug trackers and mailing lists where the user/customer can submit bug reports and feature requests. Closed ones typically don't.
The problem with bug trackers and mailing lists is that the information must be "pushed" there by an user/customer. It is usually too big step for a typical (probably non-technical) end-user. He or she just wants a working software, not to spend time to find out where would be a suitable forum to discuss about it.

Companies are "pulling" the feedback by doing, for example, user tests and market research. At least they should, if they want to sell their products. When a customer buys software, he or she expects that it is working.

The question is: how to combine these two aspects and cultures. That is happening, when companies are entering into open source software world.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to hhedberg For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#40
Am I the only one who feels that the critique is actually a single developer vs company approach difference ? A single developer is of course not equally skilled at coding, design, distribution, business and is definitely limited in the ability to do market research and whatnot. Companies work differently as they employ people with complementary skills and thus are able to be more polished and employ more techniques to better their products. This, again, has nothing to do with the measure of 'free' (do you think RedHat, Canonical et al don't do market research ?).
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:53.