|
|
2009-08-20
, 21:35
|
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#302
|
There's a smirk in my mouth somewhere...
You don't want to use the cellular access, don't use it; you don't get the option of not having it in *this* device.
Need to clear up the semantics to make a proper and convincing argument. Not using it still means I have to pay for it. Pointing me toward the iPod Touch isn't really helping Nokia's bottom line either. I'm just disappointed that they've had an Internet Tablet lineage without the need for expensive and unnecessary wireless technology.. just to spoil it with something I don't want to have to pay for. More importantly, and I will say it again, it could as easily have been a little module--just open the rear panel and plug it in. Simple. Affordable. Future upgrade. And a blissfully simple way to design ONE device to suit both crowds.
You don't want to use the cellular access, don't use it; you don't get the option of not having it in *this* device.
If you can make a convincing enough case for Nokia that there are enough people near-enough to the target audiences of this Maemo 5 device that a non-SIM version would be helpful, I'm pretty sure that they would not only listen, but due to some really interesting positioning as a flexible company on the supply chain, logistics, and regional side of things, be able to move.
| The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-08-20
, 21:37
|
|
|
Posts: 279 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ London
|
#303
|
|
|
2009-08-20
, 21:42
|
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#304
|
|
|
2009-08-20
, 21:47
|
|
|
Posts: 2,041 |
Thanked: 1,066 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Houston
|
#305
|
|
|
2009-08-20
, 21:57
|
|
|
Posts: 279 |
Thanked: 208 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ London
|
#306
|

| The Following User Says Thank You to dansus For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-08-20
, 22:01
|
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#307
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-08-20
, 22:04
|
|
|
Posts: 794 |
Thanked: 784 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ /Canada/Ontario/GTA
|
#308
|
|
|
2009-08-20
, 22:08
|
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#309
|
@danramos .... have you seen the thread on co-creation? Nokia is willing to listen to us. Perhaps you can constructively provide your input, and perhaps we'll all be the richer for it!
|
|
2009-08-20
, 22:10
|
|
|
Posts: 2,041 |
Thanked: 1,066 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Houston
|
#310
|
And a kick-A mobile OS, but will it/can it shine in this hardware?
And I'm still miffed about the prospect of having to pay ~$300 extra for a phone I don't need or want to play with fremantle. Unless I get a carrier contract I don't need or want.
N900p - with cell radio
N900t - no radio. How hard is that?