Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    updated OpenVPN package: how to distribute?

    Reply
    Page 2 of 3 | Prev |   1   2   3   | Next
    mikkov | # 11 | 2009-09-03, 22:36 | Report

    Well liblzo1 is also in sdk repository, but it is not meant to be used in device, that's where builder is gettting it

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    aboaboit | # 12 | 2009-09-04, 06:16 | Report

    Originally Posted by mikkov View Post
    Well liblzo1 is also in sdk repository, but it is not meant to be used in device, that's where builder is gettting it
    Care to provide a link to the policy of not having lzo on the device?

    I have the diablo/tools repository: if I disable that, I can't install liblzo. I'll have a look at specifying this as a dependency.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    mikkov | # 13 | 2009-09-04, 22:53 | Report

    Originally Posted by aboaboit View Post
    Care to provide a link to the policy of not having lzo on the device?

    I have the diablo/tools repository: if I disable that, I can't install liblzo. I'll have a look at specifying this as a dependency.
    SDK repository is not meant to be used in device. Liblzo can be installed as soon as it's in Extras repository. Generally Extras repository has to work with fresh OS install without adding any other repository than Extras.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to mikkov For This Useful Post:
    aboaboit

     
    aboaboit | # 14 | 2009-09-05, 15:46 | Report

    Originally Posted by mikkov View Post
    SDK repository is not meant to be used in device. Liblzo can be installed as soon as it's in Extras repository. Generally Extras repository has to work with fresh OS install without adding any other repository than Extras.
    I think now I understand where I went wrong:
    • ssl: I accepted the original debian requirement of 0.9.8g-9, even though openvpn mandates a minimum 0.9.5 and osso-software-version-rx44 for the N810 specifies 0.9.8e-9maemo3 as dependency
    • lzo: here I assumed that the SDK would have all required packages and changed the dependency of lzo2 to lzo instead of installing lzo2 from extras as would have been proper

    Hopefully, the dependencies are correct now and allow clean installation on a pristine N810. Thank you very much for the patience.

    I have already submitted the package to the autobuilder. Later, I'll check whether my (now) spurious libssl0.9.8g package is being considered in the dependencies or hopefully not.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by aboaboit; 2009-09-05 at 15:59.
    The Following User Says Thank You to aboaboit For This Useful Post:
    mikkov

     
    mikkov | # 15 | 2009-09-05, 19:07 | Report

    thanks, np

    I haven't checked the autobuilder logs, but it may be that you have to ask debmaster (jeremiah) to remove too "new" version of libssl from extras-devel.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    deter3 | # 16 | 2009-09-06, 17:39 | Report

    Can I have openvpn v2.0.9-4etch1maemo1 back ?

    I installed openvpn 2.1~rc19-1maemo3 , all my ultravpn and alonweb account can not work anymore .

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    aboaboit | # 17 | 2009-09-06, 19:42 | Report

    Originally Posted by deter3 View Post
    Can I have openvpn v2.0.9-4etch1maemo1 back ?
    It is still available here:
    http://repository.maemo.org/extras/p...ree/o/openvpn/

    Originally Posted by deter3 View Post
    I installed openvpn 2.1~rc19-1maemo3 , all my ultravpn and alonweb account can not work anymore .
    I am not aware of any compatibility issues. Can you provide some more information? Sadly, "can not work" is not quite helpful for debugging.

    Try one of the following:
    • applet: run the "test" mode, save the log and post it here
    • commandline: run "openvpn nameofconfig.conf" and, again, copy the output

    EDIT: did you check the OpenVPN FAQ ? Easy money that you have not specified a port number in your configs

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by aboaboit; 2009-09-08 at 10:56. Reason: added link to FAQ

     
    jeremiah | # 18 | 2009-09-06, 20:41 | Report

    I am going to remove the spurious libssl, see if that helps things.

    Jeremiah

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to jeremiah For This Useful Post:
    aboaboit

     
    jeremiah | # 19 | 2009-09-06, 21:07 | Report

    I have removed openssl, its sources and its built debs in both arches.

    Jeremiah

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    aboaboit | # 20 | 2009-09-06, 22:10 | Report

    Originally Posted by jeremiah View Post
    I have removed openssl, its sources and its built debs in both arches.
    Jeremiah
    Great. I went ahead, added an epoch and resubmitted. Package builds ok and the required libssl version now matches the one available in Diablo.

    However, the package promoter only shows the source as being moveable while the binaries are not "tickable".

    What gives?

    EDIT: maybe the promoter needed to sleep it over ;-) Now it is ok.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by aboaboit; 2009-09-07 at 05:53.

     
    Page 2 of 3 | Prev |   1   2   3   | Next
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout