Notices


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1,208 | Thanked: 1,028 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#11
Well liblzo1 is also in sdk repository, but it is not meant to be used in device, that's where builder is gettting it
 
aboaboit's Avatar
Posts: 129 | Thanked: 60 times | Joined on Jul 2009 @ Castello d'Argile (BO)
#12
Originally Posted by mikkov View Post
Well liblzo1 is also in sdk repository, but it is not meant to be used in device, that's where builder is gettting it
Care to provide a link to the policy of not having lzo on the device?

I have the diablo/tools repository: if I disable that, I can't install liblzo. I'll have a look at specifying this as a dependency.
 
Posts: 1,208 | Thanked: 1,028 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#13
Originally Posted by aboaboit View Post
Care to provide a link to the policy of not having lzo on the device?

I have the diablo/tools repository: if I disable that, I can't install liblzo. I'll have a look at specifying this as a dependency.
SDK repository is not meant to be used in device. Liblzo can be installed as soon as it's in Extras repository. Generally Extras repository has to work with fresh OS install without adding any other repository than Extras.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to mikkov For This Useful Post:
aboaboit's Avatar
Posts: 129 | Thanked: 60 times | Joined on Jul 2009 @ Castello d'Argile (BO)
#14
Originally Posted by mikkov View Post
SDK repository is not meant to be used in device. Liblzo can be installed as soon as it's in Extras repository. Generally Extras repository has to work with fresh OS install without adding any other repository than Extras.
I think now I understand where I went wrong:
  • ssl: I accepted the original debian requirement of 0.9.8g-9, even though openvpn mandates a minimum 0.9.5 and osso-software-version-rx44 for the N810 specifies 0.9.8e-9maemo3 as dependency
  • lzo: here I assumed that the SDK would have all required packages and changed the dependency of lzo2 to lzo instead of installing lzo2 from extras as would have been proper

Hopefully, the dependencies are correct now and allow clean installation on a pristine N810. Thank you very much for the patience.

I have already submitted the package to the autobuilder. Later, I'll check whether my (now) spurious libssl0.9.8g package is being considered in the dependencies or hopefully not.

Last edited by aboaboit; 2009-09-05 at 15:59.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to aboaboit For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,208 | Thanked: 1,028 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#15
thanks, np

I haven't checked the autobuilder logs, but it may be that you have to ask debmaster (jeremiah) to remove too "new" version of libssl from extras-devel.
 
Posts: 99 | Thanked: 25 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ shanghai , China
#16
Can I have openvpn v2.0.9-4etch1maemo1 back ?

I installed openvpn 2.1~rc19-1maemo3 , all my ultravpn and alonweb account can not work anymore .
 
aboaboit's Avatar
Posts: 129 | Thanked: 60 times | Joined on Jul 2009 @ Castello d'Argile (BO)
#17
Originally Posted by deter3 View Post
Can I have openvpn v2.0.9-4etch1maemo1 back ?
It is still available here:
http://repository.maemo.org/extras/p...ree/o/openvpn/

Originally Posted by deter3 View Post
I installed openvpn 2.1~rc19-1maemo3 , all my ultravpn and alonweb account can not work anymore .
I am not aware of any compatibility issues. Can you provide some more information? Sadly, "can not work" is not quite helpful for debugging.

Try one of the following:
  • applet: run the "test" mode, save the log and post it here
  • commandline: run "openvpn nameofconfig.conf" and, again, copy the output

EDIT: did you check the OpenVPN FAQ ? Easy money that you have not specified a port number in your configs

Last edited by aboaboit; 2009-09-08 at 10:56. Reason: added link to FAQ
 
jeremiah's Avatar
Posts: 170 | Thanked: 261 times | Joined on Feb 2009 @ Gothenburg, Sweden
#18
I am going to remove the spurious libssl, see if that helps things.

Jeremiah
 

The Following User Says Thank You to jeremiah For This Useful Post:
jeremiah's Avatar
Posts: 170 | Thanked: 261 times | Joined on Feb 2009 @ Gothenburg, Sweden
#19
I have removed openssl, its sources and its built debs in both arches.

Jeremiah
 
aboaboit's Avatar
Posts: 129 | Thanked: 60 times | Joined on Jul 2009 @ Castello d'Argile (BO)
#20
Originally Posted by jeremiah View Post
I have removed openssl, its sources and its built debs in both arches.
Jeremiah
Great. I went ahead, added an epoch and resubmitted. Package builds ok and the required libssl version now matches the one available in Diablo.

However, the package promoter only shows the source as being moveable while the binaries are not "tickable".

What gives?

EDIT: maybe the promoter needed to sleep it over ;-) Now it is ok.

Last edited by aboaboit; 2009-09-07 at 05:53.
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:37.