|
|
2009-09-29
, 01:14
|
|
Posts: 36 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
|
#11
|
|
|
2009-09-29
, 01:19
|
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#12
|
|
|
2009-09-29
, 02:19
|
|
Posts: 149 |
Thanked: 140 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ YUL
|
#13
|
Wait it does not support that officially as it can't do 802.11 b/g/n at all? Or that it can with hackery?
|
|
2009-09-29
, 02:21
|
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#14
|
optimized to ensure seamless coexistence between GPS, Bluetooth, FM, WLAN and cellular functions.
| The Following User Says Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-09-29
, 02:30
|
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#15
|
|
|
2009-09-29
, 02:33
|
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#16
|
That would seem sensible, but the beta kernel indicates a SI4713 chip for FM TX, and a BCM2048 for FM RX. The BCM2048 is BT 2.0+EDR, but the N900 specs say 2.1. Confusing much? I suppose it's possible they switched at the last minute, and this would also explain why FM RX is not supported.
| The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-09-29
, 09:31
|
|
Posts: 149 |
Thanked: 140 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ YUL
|
#17
|
|
|
2009-09-29
, 16:49
|
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,309 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#18
|
That would seem sensible, but the beta kernel indicates a SI4713 chip for FM TX, and a BCM2048 for FM RX. The BCM2048 is BT 2.0+EDR, but the N900 specs say 2.1. Confusing much? I suppose it's possible they switched at the last minute, and this would also explain why FM RX is not supported.
|
|
2009-09-29
, 18:40
|
|
|
Posts: 3,404 |
Thanked: 4,474 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Germany
|
#19
|
|
|
2009-09-29
, 18:42
|
|
Posts: 275 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Raleigh, NC
|
#20
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| gps, n900, navilink 6.0 |
| Thread Tools | |
|