Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#11
the big info missing on this is radiation source, and radiation type.

note the illustration on the right:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioac...Types_of_decay

alpha and beta radiation can be stopped by paper and aluminum respectively, gamma however is the nasty one that can only be stopped by lead or similar dense substance.
__________________
Be warned, posts are often line of thoughts at highway speeds...
 
Flandry's Avatar
Posts: 1,559 | Thanked: 1,786 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Boston
#12
I think it goes without saying that they're not going to be using gamma radiation sources in a power pack.intended for consumer electronics. lol
 
Posts: 607 | Thanked: 450 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Washington, DC
#13
There are as many battery technologies out there in the investigation stage as their are academic grants to fuel them. I don't hold out high hopes for any of them in the near future. I would much rather Nokia invested in something like the Toshiba fuel cell technology"

http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/06/t...nes-at-ceatec/

I am also pleased that Nokia has invested in the Qi wireless power technology and I hope to see it in the N910.

http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/n...er-consortium/
 
Posts: 1,258 | Thanked: 672 times | Joined on Mar 2009
#14
Even after these new technologies reach production stage, it's often just one company making them, defending it vigorously through patents, and setting prices like their monopoly situation allows...
 
ossipena's Avatar
Posts: 3,159 | Thanked: 2,023 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Finland
#15
Originally Posted by shadowjk View Post
Even after these new technologies reach production stage, it's often just one company making them, defending it vigorously through patents, and setting prices like their monopoly situation allows...
Yes, they want money invested in r&d back. Who would do r&d if nobody couldn't gain money from it?
 
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#16
most real R&D these days are done at universities, then the students patent in private and spin a company around it.

xerox parc and similar is very rare these days...
__________________
Be warned, posts are often line of thoughts at highway speeds...
 
Flandry's Avatar
Posts: 1,559 | Thanked: 1,786 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Boston
#17
LOL "the students patent in private". Not in my neck of the woods. Any IP that comes up during research has been claimed several times over by the funding entity (usually a company these days), school, and principal investigator.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flandry For This Useful Post:
Posts: 607 | Thanked: 450 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Washington, DC
#18
Originally Posted by tso View Post
most real R&D these days are done at universities, then the students patent in private and spin a company around it.

xerox parc and similar is very rare these days...
True. The unfortunate thing is that much of the research is publicly funded. Now if governments would just write into grants that patent rights reverted to the public domain in two or three years, we could move forward more expeditiously.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:29.