Poll: What is the best time for you ?
Poll Options
What is the best time for you ?

Reply
Thread Tools
qgil's Avatar
Posts: 3,105 | Thanked: 11,087 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Mountain View (CA, USA)
#41
Sorry but I didn't have the time to go through the extras-testing instructions. Busy morning and I put my community time on the Brainstorm stuff. Tomorrow, if nobody stepped in before.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to qgil For This Useful Post:
Jaffa's Avatar
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#42
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
It'd be a great project to really get things moving on the hildon-application-manager development collaboration.
X-Fade mentioned at the summit that there was already a project in the works. First I'd heard of it, although perhaps I misunderstood.

It was going to be a store-like application using the downloads API.
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post:
Jaffa's Avatar
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#43
Originally Posted by qgil View Post
Sorry but I didn't have the time to go through the extras-testing instructions. Busy morning and I put my community time on the Brainstorm stuff. Tomorrow, if nobody stepped in before.
I've got 9.08-11 which is writing and communicating to testers. I think there are five things needed:
  1. A full-blown specification of the process which forms the basis of X-Fade's implementation. This is http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing (?)
  2. A friendly (i.e. low-text, high clarity) document telling people how to test applications in Extras Testing.
  3. A simple bullet list of MUST, SHOULD and COULD items for testers. i.e. "MUST have a 48px [font]XB-Maemo-Icon-26[/font]", "SHOULD have a [font]XB-Maemo-DIsplay-Name[/font]", ...
  4. A variety of small improvements to the UI of /packages/ (such as emphasising the version number in the QA view), hand-in-hand with #2. This includes a link to #3
  5. A friendly document telling maintainers how Extras Testing works. This is some of http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing

Up until now, this is the first time I've seen this collateral list indexed. Without being clear on the audience, the chances of coming up with a good document(s) is slim.

Thoughts?
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post:
Posts: 654 | Thanked: 664 times | Joined on Feb 2009 @ Germany
#44
Originally Posted by Jaffa View Post
X-Fade mentioned at the summit that there was already a project in the works. First I'd heard of it, although perhaps I misunderstood.

It was going to be a store-like application using the downloads API.
Not sure, if we´re talking about the same thing. But I think Daniel Wilms is working on a qt app for downloading/installing/rating apps. Not completely sure, though...
 
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#45
Originally Posted by zerojay View Post
It feels almost stupid that this has to be organized at all because this should ALREADY BE HAPPENING ANYWAYS.
Human society does not work this way. You do not get result if you do not motivate humans.

300 people got N900s at Summit and apparently aren't interested in helping at all.
What does testing a package give them? Not to mention the current voting UI...
 
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#46
Originally Posted by fms View Post
Human society does not work this way. You do not get result if you do not motivate humans.

What does testing a package give them? Not to mention the current voting UI...
So, karma for rating packages?
__________________
maemo.org profile
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
Posts: 5 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Sep 2007
#47
Originally Posted by zerojay View Post
It feels almost stupid that this has to be organized at all because this should ALREADY BE HAPPENING ANYWAYS. 300 people got N900s at Summit and apparently aren't interested in helping at all. Incredible.

Add another option... "Anytime", please.
That's simply not true. At least for me it's not known what the state of stuff in extras-devel is supposed to be. I install and try a lot of stuff, but the maemo way of handling bugs found in extras-devel is still a mystery to me.

As a newbie to the community, it would help to do this in a form of a marathon, thus learning the community practices on this.

Plus, it's more fun together than separately.
 
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#48
Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
So, karma for rating packages?
100% agree.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to fms For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,208 | Thanked: 1,028 times | Joined on Oct 2007
#49
Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
So, karma for rating packages?
There's currently 0.25 (I believe) points for thumbs up/down and 1 point for a comment
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to mikkov For This Useful Post:
yerga's Avatar
Posts: 696 | Thanked: 1,012 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Asturies, Spain
#50
Originally Posted by conny View Post
Not sure, if we´re talking about the same thing. But I think Daniel Wilms is working on a qt app for downloading/installing/rating apps. Not completely sure, though...
I'd say this is the garage project for the application: https://garage.maemo.org/projects/appmanager/
__________________
Daniel Martín Yerga
maemo.org profile
Twitter
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to yerga For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:36.