Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    Email/Modest Question (IMAP vs. POP)

    Reply
    Page 1 of 2 | 1   2   | Next
    Laughing Man | # 1 | 2009-11-06, 01:36 | Report

    Is there anyone who has the n900 that has lots of emails (100+) that are being synced via IMAP? How is the performance on that, and once its synced, and you go offline does it store a local copy of the recent emails?

    I don't get to do deletion on my accounts that often (busy busy). Part of the reason why I'm buying the n900 is so I can keep up to date with emails. But I was wondering if I should go with a POP solution or a IMAP solution, my current gmail and hotmail accounts are a mix of both but I was thinking of switching them all to IMAP that way everything is synchronized. (though when Thunderbird downloads them they're still not marked as read already...)

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Andre Klapper | # 2 | 2009-11-06, 09:55 | Report

    There are some issues filed in bugs.maemo.org with regard to large mailboxes. It's being worked on.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to Andre Klapper For This Useful Post:
    Laughing Man

     
    McChicken | # 3 | 2009-11-06, 10:21 | Report

    I think that I cannot have any other way than IMAP on the N900 due to that if using POP the emails will be D/L and deleted on the server = then the N900 have to be my MAIN computer...maybe I am wrong but that is how I see it.
    IMAP = emails stay on the server
    POP = get D/L to the device and erased on server

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    edgar2 | # 4 | 2009-11-06, 10:23 | Report

    Originally Posted by McChicken View Post
    IMAP = emails stay on the server
    POP = get D/L to the device and erased on server
    it does not have to be that way. you can tell the pop server to leave the messages after retrieval.


    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by edgar2; 2009-11-06 at 10:32.

     
    edgar2 | # 5 | 2009-11-06, 10:47 | Report

    Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
    Is there anyone who has the n900 that has lots of emails (100+) that are being synced via IMAP? How is the performance on that, and once its synced, and you go offline does it store a local copy of the recent emails?

    I don't get to do deletion on my accounts that often (busy busy). Part of the reason why I'm buying the n900 is so I can keep up to date with emails. But I was wondering if I should go with a POP solution or a IMAP solution, my current gmail and hotmail accounts are a mix of both but I was thinking of switching them all to IMAP that way everything is synchronized. (though when Thunderbird downloads them they're still not marked as read already...)
    as andre said, there are some issues reported with imap and large number of mails. at the moment i solved it by moving all inbox messages to a subfolder (inboxarchive). that way day-to-day email is snappy and pleasant. when browsing large number of emails eventually gets convenient i might move old mails back from the subfolder again (which, i should add, is still accessible on the n900).

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to edgar2 For This Useful Post:
    goodfellabk718, Laughing Man

     
    yerga | # 6 | 2009-11-06, 14:37 | Report

    Also, the reported performance problems are with folders >10000 emails.
    I have some folders with 1000-2000 emails and it works fairly well.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to yerga For This Useful Post:
    goodfellabk718, Laughing Man, manda

     
    fms | # 7 | 2009-11-06, 15:29 | Report

    POP3 does not currently work in Modest. See this bug:

    https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5839

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Laughing Man | # 8 | 2009-11-06, 21:29 | Report

    Originally Posted by yerga View Post
    Also, the reported performance problems are with folders >10000 emails.
    I have some folders with 1000-2000 emails and it works fairly well.
    Ah ok, my concern was more around the 500-1000 level, not 10000 emails.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    jjx | # 9 | 2009-11-06, 23:28 | Report

    Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
    Ah ok, my concern was more around the 500-1000 level, not 10000 emails.
    My inbox has 12000 mails, and you should see the other 400 or so folders :-)

    At least I don't receive 1000 spams per day plus 5000 backscatters like I did a few years ago. Yay for improved spam filtering and greylisting :-)

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    jjx | # 10 | 2009-11-07, 00:09 | Report

    Fwiw, I expect I will continue keeping my main inbox on my server, and filtering emails heavily so that only personal and work contacts, and replies to things I have written on mailing lists, are forwarded to my N900. The rest will be accessible on the server as usual, but not shouting their beepy goodness at me on the N900 through the day.

    Oh dear, I'm quite looking forward to designing my personal info-handling workflow. I think I might be becoming a geek ;-)

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 1 of 2 | 1   2   | Next
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout