|
|
2009-11-18
, 23:10
|
|
Posts: 59 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#12
|
|
|
2009-11-18
, 23:12
|
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#13
|
|
|
2009-11-18
, 23:39
|
|
|
Administrator |
Posts: 1,036 |
Thanked: 2,018 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Germany
|
#14
|
|
|
2009-11-18
, 23:42
|
|
|
Posts: 24 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Germany
|
#15
|
|
|
2009-11-19
, 00:06
|
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#16
|
|
|
2009-11-19
, 00:06
|
|
|
Posts: 635 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Black Mesa Research Facility
|
#17
|
Looking at their rating system, its totally reasonable. You have to admit that those reviews that were more in favor of the N900 praised its UI,.... and its UI... and multitasking... and the UI.
Chip does rate the UI, but only as part of the "ergonomics" category, which in turn makes only 25% of the overall outcome. The other 75% are calculated from hard facts.
Given that multitasking on the N900 is only a marketing thing (because all S60 phones can do it, so you really wonder why Nokia puts so much emphasis on it with Maemo now) and the quality of a UI is highly subjective, it's a valid and reasonable thing to do when you rate a product. Focus on what you can measure, what is objective, and let other factors only play a minor role.
|
|
2009-11-19
, 00:36
|
|
Posts: 2,014 |
Thanked: 1,581 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#18
|
Seeing that N97 and N97 mini are leading tells me enough. That said i totally understand the point they are making about the phone side and they are not the only ones, but the thing is i know exactly what i'm getting there and i'm not worried.
Battery life in a other hand is something i need to see more reviews... dont think it will affect me buying N900 or not thought
|
|
2009-11-19
, 00:47
|
|
Posts: 74 |
Thanked: 142 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Chicago, US
|
#19
|
|
|
2009-11-19
, 00:50
|
|
Posts: 248 |
Thanked: 72 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#20
|
Chip does rate the UI, but only as part of the "ergonomics" category, which in turn makes only 25% of the overall outcome. The other 75% are calculated from hard facts.
Given that multitasking on the N900 is only a marketing thing (because all S60 phones can do it, so you really wonder why Nokia puts so much emphasis on it with Maemo now) and the quality of a UI is highly subjective, it's a valid and reasonable thing to do when you rate a product. Focus on what you can measure, what is objective, and let other factors only play a minor role.