|
|
2009-11-20
, 17:17
|
|
|
Posts: 103 |
Thanked: 44 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Nashville, TN
|
#12
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to jsuggs For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-11-20
, 17:33
|
|
Posts: 607 |
Thanked: 450 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Washington, DC
|
#13
|
Of course it has the same features but without privacy concerns and useless bloat.
|
|
2009-11-20
, 17:35
|
|
|
Posts: 415 |
Thanked: 193 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
@ A place with no mountains
|
#14
|

|
|
2009-11-20
, 17:35
|
|
|
Posts: 445 |
Thanked: 572 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford
|
#15
|
|
|
2009-11-20
, 17:37
|
|
Posts: 287 |
Thanked: 165 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ The Netherlands
|
#16
|
Xmarks is sh*tty anyway, since they collect your bookmarks data for data mining. And manipulates your Google results by default. Just use Mozilla's own Weave, it does the same thing, better.
| The Following User Says Thank You to robbie For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-11-20
, 17:43
|
|
Posts: 472 |
Thanked: 107 times |
Joined on Apr 2007
@ Texas
|
#17
|
|
|
2009-11-20
, 18:00
|
|
Posts: 607 |
Thanked: 450 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Washington, DC
|
#18
|
|
|
2009-12-08
, 14:57
|
|
|
Posts: 103 |
Thanked: 44 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Nashville, TN
|
#20
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to jsuggs For This Useful Post: | ||
My blog (mostly about my themes)