Active Topics
-
HDMI with Leste (1)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 1 day, 14 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (9)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 3 days, 15 hrs ago - more...
 |
|
2009-12-03
, 23:58
|
|
Posts: 1,674 |
Thanked: 171 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Anderson, IN
|
#1032
|
Would it be possible for you to make a version that will open fennec instead of tear? I tried changing the script myself but ended up screwing up and had to reflash.
__________________
There is only one Return, and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
There is only one Return, and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
|
|
2009-12-04
, 02:35
|
|
Posts: 114 |
Thanked: 201 times |
Joined on Apr 2009
|
#1033
|
Originally Posted by munky261
Shouldn't be too hard to do, it's on the list of things to do along with config file support.
Would it be possible for you to make a version that will open fennec instead of tear?
Originally Posted by munky261
Did you install the script by hand, or did you use my package? If you used my package and uninstalling the package didn't return things to the way they were, that's a serious bug and I'd like to know more about what happened.
I tried changing the script myself but ended up screwing up and had to reflash.
|
|
2009-12-04
, 03:58
|
|
Posts: 114 |
Thanked: 201 times |
Joined on Apr 2009
|
#1034
|
Originally Posted by xiojason
Open-source licenses fall into two broad categories: copyleft and non-copyleft.
I don't know the ins and outs of licensing enough to make an informed choice, so I'm open to education and suggestion.
A copyleft license is one where changes to the work must also be licensed under an open-source license (usually the same one as the original work). The canonical example is the GPL, used by the Linux kernel, most GNU project software, and Tear, amongst many others.
Non-copyleft licenses, by contrast, don't have this requirement -- they allow you to redistribute and modify the software without requiring that the source be made available. A simple example is the ISC license, used by the BIND DNS server and the OpenBSD project for most new code they write.
Philosophical debates perpetually rage about which approach is better, but realistically, for a project this size it probably doesn't matter -- pick whatever you're most comfortable with.
 |
|
2009-12-04
, 05:29
|
|
Posts: 251 |
Thanked: 131 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ USA
|
#1035
|
Originally Posted by steven676
I panicked for a second after I uninstalled it and Tear still came up, but I thought I'd try the "Micro$soft fix" before reporting it.
If you used my package and uninstalling the package didn't return things to the way they were, that's a serious bug and I'd like to know more about what happened.
I guess its good that I did, since I can now report a successful uninstall rather than failure!
-jkq
__________________
Class .. : Quiet One
Humor .. : [*********-] Alignment: Chaotic Good
Patience : [******----] Weapon(s): Python scripts
Agro ... : [***-------] Relic(s) : N900
Class .. : Quiet One
Humor .. : [*********-] Alignment: Chaotic Good
Patience : [******----] Weapon(s): Python scripts
Agro ... : [***-------] Relic(s) : N900
| The Following User Says Thank You to jkq For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-12-04
, 17:15
|
|
Posts: 1,674 |
Thanked: 171 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Anderson, IN
|
#1036
|
No, I didnt use your package, sorry for the confusion...I thought I had said that.
__________________
There is only one Return, and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
There is only one Return, and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
 |
|
2009-12-04
, 17:48
|
|
Posts: 36 |
Thanked: 74 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
@ Seattle, WA, USA
|
#1037
|
Originally Posted by steven676
I suppose GPL is fine. Any preference for v2 over v3 or vice versa?
Open-source licenses fall into two broad categories: copyleft and non-copyleft.
|
|
2009-12-04
, 23:27
|
|
Posts: 114 |
Thanked: 201 times |
Joined on Apr 2009
|
#1038
|
Originally Posted by xiojason
Not really. GPLv3's biggest changes are new provisions on patents, DRM, and freedom to replace GPLv3 code on embedded devices -- none of which seem particularly relevant for this code. The license language has also been revised to become less specific to US law.
I suppose GPL is fine. Any preference for v2 over v3 or vice versa?
If you don't have a strong opinion either way, I'd suggest licensing the code "GPL, version 2 or later" so that it's compatible with either license. (If you're worried that GPLv4 will have provisions you don't like, you can also license it "GPL, either version 2 or version 3".)
|
|
2009-12-05
, 00:09
|
|
Posts: 114 |
Thanked: 201 times |
Joined on Apr 2009
|
#1039
|
Originally Posted by jkq
Huh, that's better news . . . but I'd thought I'd gotten the uninstall to work without a reboot too. Will need to do more testing.
I panicked for a second after I uninstalled it and Tear still came up, but I thought I'd try the "Micro$soft fix" before reporting it.
I guess its good that I did, since I can now report a successful uninstall rather than failure!
Out of curiosity, did you have continuous mode enabled?
|
|
2009-12-05
, 00:42
|
|
Posts: 251 |
Thanked: 131 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ USA
|
#1040
|
Originally Posted by steven676
It was at its default -- I did not modify the script after installing it.
Huh, that's better news . . . but I'd thought I'd gotten the uninstall to work without a reboot too. Will need to do more testing.
Out of curiosity, did you have continuous mode enabled?
I did have an instance of Tear running, tho I do not recall if I started it from the script or via the launcher.
-jkq
__________________
Class .. : Quiet One
Humor .. : [*********-] Alignment: Chaotic Good
Patience : [******----] Weapon(s): Python scripts
Agro ... : [***-------] Relic(s) : N900
Class .. : Quiet One
Humor .. : [*********-] Alignment: Chaotic Good
Patience : [******----] Weapon(s): Python scripts
Agro ... : [***-------] Relic(s) : N900
 |
| Tags |
| browserd fix, microb killer, webkit |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:20.
browserfish (like babelfish)?