|
|
2007-04-17
, 02:08
|
|
Posts: 16 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#22
|
|
|
2007-04-17
, 09:40
|
|
Posts: 29 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#23
|
|
|
2007-04-17
, 11:17
|
|
Posts: 29 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#24
|
|
|
2007-04-18
, 07:06
|
|
Posts: 29 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#25
|
|
|
2007-04-18
, 08:18
|
|
|
Posts: 344 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Jan 2007
|
#26
|
|
|
2007-04-18
, 11:37
|
|
Posts: 29 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#27
|
)|
|
2007-04-18
, 12:17
|
|
Posts: 213 |
Thanked: 27 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Barbados
|
#28
|
|
|
2007-04-18
, 15:20
|
|
|
Posts: 242 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ USA & BharatVarsh ( INDIA - Kerala ).
|
#29
|
Everything said and done, I think Nokia is going to meet its match. Intel is notorious for hardballing Industry bigwigs. There have been so many little industries that Intel gobbled up in its wake. Not that this will happen to Nokia. Intel is like a gorilla, who at any instance can go berserk on you. I worked for Intel, and to some tiny little extent, I like to think that I know how they think. If they seriously get into this MID business then Nokia better watch out. With the money, power and the clout that Intel has it may just as well beat the crap out of Nokia. The fact that Intel MIDs will be using a Chinese flavor of Linux is also a wake up call for Nokia who did not care much and would not / could not make the most of the cool hand they dealt to themselves.
|
|
2007-04-19
, 02:09
|
|
Posts: 3,401 |
Thanked: 1,255 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ London, UK
|
#30
|

I suspect that since Intel are only offering reference platforms (ie. example hardware) that anyone can put whatever they want on the device once the hardware is for sale, and since it will be mostly based on PC hardware I imagine there might be several distributions and GUIs offered in the long term - whether a desktop GUI is appropriate for this type of device is up for debate.