|
|
2005-12-19
, 02:30
|
|
Posts: 32 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#12
|
Contrary to what you might like to believe, the Nokia 770 is _not_ an open device: you cannot recreate copies of it in your DVD-writer to hand out to your friends, the hardware specs are not published in their entirity and even significant parts of the software are very firmly closed source.

|
|
2005-12-19
, 03:05
|
|
Posts: 42 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#13
|
That's almost word for word the kind of advice people were given in the Windows 3.x days.
This is not the Linux way. It's not even the Way Of Mrs. Cosmopilite.
|
|
2005-12-19
, 05:57
|
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
|
#14
|
|
|
2005-12-19
, 07:24
|
|
Posts: 54 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2005
|
#15
|
(came in a Linux mag, lol)|
|
2005-12-19
, 10:50
|
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#16
|
Based on your first criteria, even devices based on opencores.org designs aren't open. Hardware is a tangible good and it costs money. The computer you're running your gratis open source software on costs money, and can't be handed out to friends. The 770 is no different, it's just smaller and cuter
As to your other criteria, I'd be interested to hear what project you've been unable to complete due to a lack of source or specs. It's true that not *everything* is available, but a tremendous amount is, and no portable device from a major manufacturer comes close except possibly the Zaurus.
I don't think that the 770 is any buggier than your average first-generation device, but I understand your frustration. You want a device that just works. I just think it's worth noting that there are other folks who want a flexible, open hardware platform. They're willing to find, report, and sometimes fix bugs to get it. If you do eventually pick up a 770 when the 06 firmware is released, you'll have all the folks working with the device now to thank for the improvements that Nokia couldn't have done alone. I just don't get why you're so angry that the device is available now to people who want it in its current state.
Mike
|
|
2005-12-19
, 14:13
|
|
Posts: 949 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Jul 2005
|
#17
|
|
|
2005-12-19
, 14:41
|
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#18
|

|
|
2005-12-19
, 15:06
|
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Midlands, UK
|
#19
|
I can see things can get quite heated here.
As for the OS being open source or not: Sure, the foundations are. What Nokia has added to it -- the GUI and several other things -- are not. That's their competitive edge, and to think they should do away with that is just foolish and worse than idealistic.

|
|
2005-12-19
, 15:40
|
|
Posts: 949 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Jul 2005
|
#20
|
If I have to shell out almost 400 Euros to find out something doesn't work properly yet, I'd rather not, thankyouverymuch.