Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    N900 as a Wifi Hotspot

    Reply
    Page 7 of 20 | Prev |   5     6   7   8     9   17 | Next | Last
    aboaboit | # 61 | 2010-01-06, 17:59 | Report

    Originally Posted by rambo View Post
    edit: also INVALID, not WONTFIX, major difference...
    Yes, I assumed iwconfig's error was fatal, my bad. However, it still doesn't work. Anyone else wants to take a pass at it?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    bmouring | # 62 | 2010-01-08, 17:17 | Report

    Originally Posted by aboaboit View Post
    Yes, I assumed iwconfig's error was fatal, my bad. However, it still doesn't work. Anyone else wants to take a pass at it?
    This isn't entirely unexpected: according to this the wl12xx driver series is not known to work in AP mode. Seems like you may have determined that it doesn't work. I will try to take a stab at setting it up this weekend (along with trying to finish compiling mupen64plus)

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    rambo | # 63 | 2010-01-18, 12:39 | Report

    Niels pointed out this mockup http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pi...d=253209882786

    I wonder how they intent to handle NAT (supposing they do not wish to flash the kernel)

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    speculatrix | # 64 | 2010-01-18, 15:59 | Report

    Originally Posted by rambo View Post
    Niels pointed out this mockup http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pi...d=253209882786

    I wonder how they intent to handle NAT (supposing they do not wish to flash the kernel)
    simply compile up a bunch of kernel modules which can be loaded when the program starts - you don't even have to have them in the /lib/modules/n.nn.... directory, just insmod rather than modprobe

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    jebba | # 65 | 2010-01-18, 18:31 | Report

    Originally Posted by speculatrix View Post
    simply compile up a bunch of kernel modules which can be loaded when the program starts - you don't even have to have them in the /lib/modules/n.nn.... directory, just insmod rather than modprobe
    The NAT modules can't be used this way with the existing kernel (at least as shipped with PR1, I haven't confirmed with PR1.1).

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    qole | # 66 | 2010-01-18, 18:31 | Report

    Originally Posted by speculatrix View Post
    simply compile up a bunch of kernel modules which can be loaded when the program starts - you don't even have to have them in the /lib/modules/n.nn.... directory, just insmod rather than modprobe
    According to this thread, no. That's not going to work.

    Originally Posted by micalil View Post
    Hi all.
    After two days of pajama hacking I'm now sure that stock 2009.42-11 kernel cannot support NAT modules in a proper way, because the netfilter core is compiled in without CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK or CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MODULE (see line 214 of net/netfilter/core.c).

    So, no matter how hard we try to get a "debian-polite" way to add needed modules to this kernel, they will simply not work.

    I'm posting this to see how other people involved in tethering projects would think about what we are in front of, specifically:

    * Build a new, more modulable, kernel without getting too far from the rx51_defconfig and go with it.
    * Go completely userland via proxies of any sort, even heavily tweaked for low resource usage.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    rambo | # 67 | 2010-01-18, 21:28 | Report

    Originally Posted by jebba View Post
    I haven't confirmed with PR1.1).
    Got latest "apt-get source kernel" few days ago "make rx51_defconfig" yields config that does not have conntrack symbols enabled.

    So no NAT modules for PR1.1 stock kernel, when I have more time I'll make a script that will build a hotspot version of the latest kernel in repos (basically "apt-get source", patch a bunch of things, rename directories and packages and run dpkg-buildpackage)

    this post outlines userland approach that might be worth considering (OTOH it's possible to flash the kernel from a .deb. I just consider it more than a bit sleazy to do that without showing some large disclaimers [other than the nokia default one] firsty).

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to rambo For This Useful Post:
    qole

     
    Bratag | # 68 | 2010-01-18, 21:39 | Report

    Assuming you have seen this

    http://www.allaboutmaemo.com/news/it...a_WiFi_hot.php

    Looks like if we hold out a little while there will be a nice little graphical interface that does this for us.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    R-R | # 69 | 2010-01-18, 21:41 | Report

    Is there a bug report for the symbol/nat/kernel/module issue i can vote on?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to R-R For This Useful Post:
    qole

     
    jebba | # 70 | 2010-01-18, 23:14 | Report

    Have you worked around this yet? I haven't poked at a PR1.1 kernel due to this. I haven't investigated it deeper yet though:

    "Kernel in PR1.1 build-depends on fiasco-gen which is nowhere to be found"
    https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7972

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to jebba For This Useful Post:
    qole

     
    Page 7 of 20 | Prev |   5     6   7   8     9   17 | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout