|
|
2010-01-17
, 00:41
|
|
|
Posts: 297 |
Thanked: 54 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ new jersey, usa
|
#141
|
|
|
2010-01-17
, 00:48
|
|
|
Posts: 610 |
Thanked: 391 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
@ DC, USA
|
#142
|
|
|
2010-01-17
, 01:16
|
|
|
Posts: 136 |
Thanked: 72 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#143
|
|
|
2010-01-17
, 01:22
|
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#144
|
|
|
2010-01-17
, 01:49
|
|
Banned |
Posts: 537 |
Thanked: 117 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ N900 LAND
|
#145
|
|
|
2010-01-17
, 02:30
|
|
|
Posts: 6,668 |
Thanked: 15,030 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ undecided.
|
#146
|
Well. Kudos to Nokia for not polluting the airwaves and keeping a low profile while at the same time being moderately successful. I always disliked the attention whore approach. I would like to test-ban all advertising globally for 5 years and see what happens when this damn toothpaste smile finally disappears and the advertized turds lose their polish.
"Do you know that most people read ads about things they already own? They don’t read things to buy them, but to feel reassured that they have already bought the right thing." - Marshall McLuhan
|
|
2010-01-17
, 03:59
|
|
|
Posts: 63 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
@ Ponte Vedra, FL, USA
|
#147
|
N900 dont exist with a nice price if you stays with youre operator for 18 or 24 month ?
Cant belive that USA is so abandon
|
|
2010-01-17
, 04:52
|
|
|
Posts: 136 |
Thanked: 72 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#148
|
|
|
2010-01-17
, 04:56
|
|
|
Posts: 819 |
Thanked: 806 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
@ Oxnard, Ca.
|
#149
|
|
|
2010-01-17
, 08:12
|
|
|
Posts: 6,668 |
Thanked: 15,030 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ undecided.
|
#150
|
I don't know about the mindshare thing, Nokia has been given many references in popular culture. You can't accomplish this by being a no-name. On the other hand, being parodied is usually a signifier of being yesterdays news.
I agree that Nokia didn't make the transition from "cuboid" like Sony or Microsoft to "spherical" like Google or Apple yet. But unlike Microsoft, i believe Nokia still does well and has the potential to make it. Ovi / Maemo may play a key role here, or at least be a step in the right direction, but without proper internal restructuring, which i hope has already begun, i see dark clouds emerging.
What unites all the cuboids is that they were all major players, but now appear sort of paralyzed, too bulky to move, confused and unable to adapt to the new situation, let alone shape new situations through innovation. Of course many mistakes have been made, but considering Nokias history (they even built wheelchairs in the past), and especially when looking at their research department, the worst thing to do is to underestimate or even write off Nokia.
And of course one shouldn't forget the nationalism thing mentioned above. The US is still in a depression, psychologically and financially, so grant them their opium. Even if its just hype-ractive amerocentric journaltainment, the immature kind.