|
|
2010-01-18
, 12:22
|
|
Posts: 87 |
Thanked: 27 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Germany
|
#72
|
|
|
2010-01-18
, 12:38
|
|
Posts: 42 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#73
|
Okay, sorry for the late reply, but before submitting a bug, I wanted to check this behaviour further.
Over the weekend my N900 was under low, medium at best usage. I couldn't reproduce nor find the same strange power drain from the first day after the firmware update. Battery was "ok" for N900 standards and my experience.
|
|
2010-01-18
, 21:39
|
|
Posts: 116 |
Thanked: 86 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ New Orleans, LA, USA
|
#74
|
. Seems that my pr1.1 battery drain is the IM services. using XMPP and Skype only. My battery was draining about 30% faster than usual. In an 8 hour work day with moderate use (about 2 hours of on device time) I'd close the work day at around 70%. With heavy use, I'd close at about 50-40%. Since the upgrade, Im closing with light, moderate or heavy use in the 40-30%. On a tip from Speedevil and the ever helpful Pupnik, I stopped using the IM services, and have been using pidgin. My battery life has actually now gone up a little bit, today after 8 hours of very heavy use, I closed the day at about 40%. I was probably on the device using IM, playing Angry Birds, and updating my blog, as well as RDP'ing into 2 desktops and a server, for about 6 1/2 hours, out of the 8. Certainly a huge upgrade from the upgrade
. Still looking forward to a bigger Mugen battery, thats a must have with an always connected device like this. I mean, whats another 1/4" in thickness honestly?|
|
2010-01-18
, 23:00
|
|
Posts: 47 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Czerwionka, Poland
|
#75
|
|
|
2010-01-18
, 23:20
|
|
Posts: 31 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#76
|
|
|
2010-01-19
, 00:01
|
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#77
|
It's just general lithium-ion battery advice. Also, slower, low-power charges are better. So the AC wall charger which puts out 1200mA an charged the N900 really fast is actually worse for its battery long-term than the day-long USB 500mA recharges. Go figure
|
|
2010-01-19
, 00:13
|
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Central NY
|
#78
|
|
|
2010-01-19
, 00:17
|
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#79
|
I installed PR1.1 via OTA this morning then fully recharged and rebooted 2-3 times. I do have the browse portrait easter egg enabled bu the browse was not open/running at the time
-no wifi
- using at&t 2G
- no apps running(or in background), only xterminal, phone is pretty much idle
- configured for nokia messaging, 30 mins update
- logged into google/skpye accounts
I've been tracking my battery life over the last 7 days and today I've noticed a huge battery drain. It went from 78% - 62% free in 1.5 hours. I would usually only drain 2-3% in 1.5 hours.
My phone is completely stock, no apps installed. I was tracking the battery from 09:30 - 12:30, everything looked great
at 13:00 I noticed the red exclaimation circle telling me I'm unable to login to google IM. I left it for 15 mins and then checked battery. drained to 72%. Noticed the phone warmer than usual
I then disabled both google/skpye IM account. Noted the availability circle gone, assumed I have logged out.
30 mins later, the battery drops from 72% to 62%. I try to log in to google IM again.. no luck
- 12:30 I had 78% battery left
- 13:00 I had 72% battery left
- 13:30 I had 62% battery left
I reboot and can immediately login to google IM.
There is no change to my usage pattern or location, I can say for sure that PR1.1 or the prior minor firmware has caused this battery drain bug. Not sure if it only happens once IM accounts cannot login or something has caused the IM account unable to login and needs a reboot.
Looks like we have a new drain bug which occurs outside of wifi! horrible!
This needs to be investigated ASAP!
|
|
2010-01-19
, 00:17
|
|
Posts: 7 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#80
|
... anyway i thought rare but ok ... may be the battery came fully charged? ... so i continue using without problem ...
...
... may be because that battery was fully charged many times with the older OS version? ... the original battery could be charged to 100% without problem and i can get nice time of usage and both indicator show the same info ... OS and 3rd party bat indicator ..
also, does anyone know if that statusbar load applet uses a lot of cpu cycles? i removed it 'cause i figured if it's polling once a few seconds then it's gotta drain the battery. anyone has any actual experience though?