Active Topics
-
Phone Camera Competition April 2021: "Funny & Foolish" (33)
to General by Fellfrosch - 11 hrs, 34 mins ago -
What's the best Handheld gnu/linux machine for 20XX? (78)
to Competitors by clort - 16 hrs, 20 mins ago -
Unofficial Storage for camera phone competition... (62)
to General by catbus - 1 day ago -
Maemo-Leste pre-alpha announcement (512)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by nonsuch - 2 days, 1 hr ago -
The Intel RealSense Smartphone prototype (0)
to Competitors by n950 - 2 days, 4 hrs ago -
Maemo Leste Playground (57)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by clort - 3 days, 1 hr ago -
A Palm OS thread ... and a thank you to the community (23)
to Alternatives by bradvesp - 4 days ago - more...
 |
|
2010-01-21
, 00:36
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#92
|
I don't have those problems because I have a different setup.
I have the beast on the internet with NIC1 and it does PPPoE to the internet, also 10.* IP in the city WAN. The second card, NIC2, is set up using Windows' ICS (basically NAT). This internal LAN serves me (gateway), my secondary PC(and NAS) and the printer along with a WRouter. The WRouter is assigned an 192.168.137.* IP and gets out through me.
As a result, my beast is the only one responsible for Internet activity, as for the phone, it queries the router and the router asks me. I reply all requests from cache or make the query myself outside.
That's why my DNS command from the CLI cached repositories and all other devices have the local IP to use.
When not cached, my PC tries to resolve repositories on its own and fails several times (usually) before they finally resolve and it all works. Why DNS fails so often I can't tell.
I'm considering adding them to etc\hosts. That should cut a lot of problems until I have to manually do this again.
As for egoshin's issue, I have little clue, or supposition why someone would choose to hide the update to wifi info. That makes NO sense. I would understand fmtx or similar, but some of those apps have nothing to show for themselves.
It must be a bug. I hate to suggest this, but could this be a fs issue? Maybe a bad flash or a busted up cluster that messed up a file? You could end up with a reflash and fresh install of all apps. I imagine that would fix everything. But it's my device :P
Edit: OTA for me both 1.01 and 1.1 because I'm on W7x64 and I didn't want to risk incompatibility. Save for the inability to play MPEG1 files (I'm sure it's silly, some library got left behind) no issues here.
Oh, and the standard stuff is known to not work, like xvid in osso-player.
Last edited by ndi; 2010-01-21 at 00:39.
I have the beast on the internet with NIC1 and it does PPPoE to the internet, also 10.* IP in the city WAN. The second card, NIC2, is set up using Windows' ICS (basically NAT). This internal LAN serves me (gateway), my secondary PC(and NAS) and the printer along with a WRouter. The WRouter is assigned an 192.168.137.* IP and gets out through me.
As a result, my beast is the only one responsible for Internet activity, as for the phone, it queries the router and the router asks me. I reply all requests from cache or make the query myself outside.
That's why my DNS command from the CLI cached repositories and all other devices have the local IP to use.
When not cached, my PC tries to resolve repositories on its own and fails several times (usually) before they finally resolve and it all works. Why DNS fails so often I can't tell.
I'm considering adding them to etc\hosts. That should cut a lot of problems until I have to manually do this again.
As for egoshin's issue, I have little clue, or supposition why someone would choose to hide the update to wifi info. That makes NO sense. I would understand fmtx or similar, but some of those apps have nothing to show for themselves.
It must be a bug. I hate to suggest this, but could this be a fs issue? Maybe a bad flash or a busted up cluster that messed up a file? You could end up with a reflash and fresh install of all apps. I imagine that would fix everything. But it's my device :P
Edit: OTA for me both 1.01 and 1.1 because I'm on W7x64 and I didn't want to risk incompatibility. Save for the inability to play MPEG1 files (I'm sure it's silly, some library got left behind) no issues here.
Oh, and the standard stuff is known to not work, like xvid in osso-player.
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
Last edited by ndi; 2010-01-21 at 00:39.
|
|
2010-01-21
, 00:37
|
|
Posts: 1,208 |
Thanked: 1,028 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#93
|
Originally Posted by egoshin
At least the first problem was caused by corrupted Release file in repositories. It should be fixed by now, but since Akamai caching seems to cause problems every now and then it's possible that the server serving you isn't up to date.
You sure? Look at this:
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=41430
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=41463
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p=485351&postcount=7
... and just browse forum 10mins.
What do these files look like when you open them with web browser?
http://repository.maemo.org/extras/d...mantle/Release
http://repository.maemo.org/extras-t...mantle/Release
http://repository.maemo.org/extras-d...mantle/Release
They should look something like this:
Architectures: armel i386 all
Components: free non-free
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:53:11 UTC
Label: Extras
Origin: maemo
Suite: fremantle
Version: 2.0
MD5Sum:
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e 0 free/binary-all/Packages
7b106d3d1528f3224efc46888424fc11 29 free/binary-all/Packages.gz
3ad59e5df9489cd5a6b6c36786d404bb 81 free/binary-all/Release
bb8379d9be4884520ab6b2491a51c849 839659 free/binary-armel/Packages
5add5ff8ac9afc39388adef4215d9687 422870 free/binary-armel/Packages.bz2
---file clipped---
Last edited by mikkov; 2010-01-21 at 00:49.
|
|
2010-01-21
, 00:39
|
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#94
|
Originally Posted by ndi
I agree fully that these specific apps he's asking about should not be hidden.. but I do not think they are being hidden by design.. there is a problem somewhere needs addressing. Whether a bug in the firmware or a problem in the network or repo's.
As for egoshin's issue, I have little clue, or supposition why someone would choose to hide the update to wifi info. That makes NO sense. I would understand fmtx or similar, but some of those apps have nothing to show for themselves.
However, I do not agree that ALL hiding of apps should be removed. I seem to be having the same philosophical discussion in several threads right now.. this is rather.. redundant.
|
|
2010-01-21
, 00:40
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#95
|
Baseline:
Architectures: armel i386 all
Components: free non-free
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:53:11 UTC
Label: Extras
Origin: maemo
Suite: fremantle
Version: 2.0
MD5Sum:
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e 0 free/binary-all/Packages
7b106d3d1528f3224efc46888424fc11 29 free/binary-all/Packages.gz
3ad59e5df9489cd5a6b6c36786d404bb 81 free/binary-all/Release
Architectures: armel i386 all
Components: free non-free
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:53:11 UTC
Label: Extras
Origin: maemo
Suite: fremantle
Version: 2.0
MD5Sum:
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e 0 free/binary-all/Packages
7b106d3d1528f3224efc46888424fc11 29 free/binary-all/Packages.gz
3ad59e5df9489cd5a6b6c36786d404bb 81 free/binary-all/Release
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
|
|
2010-01-21
, 00:44
|
|
Posts: 1,208 |
Thanked: 1,028 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#96
|
Originally Posted by fatalsaint
First one was clearly caused by this https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8286
That last one is entirely unhelpful .. it provides no details or information. The first one, half the people in the thread magically "fixed".
That middle one is actually a good thread. They are on to something at the end regarding installing and then uninstalling an app.
NDI - Did you flash 1.1 or OTA update?
ETA: The OP of the second thread posted in the first thread as now "fixed". SO whatever this problem is, it isn't consistent and seems more related to the repositories than App Manager itself.. although I'm not sure how or why.
Other ones look the same too, but the repositories should be fixed by now.
|
|
2010-01-21
, 00:45
|
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#97
|
Originally Posted by mikkov
Well.. at least I know my troubleshooting skills aren't failing me.
First one was clearly caused by this https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8286
Other ones look the same too, but the repositories should be fixed by now.
And his information appears to be missing certain key signatures.
ETA: Most notably,
bb8379d9be4884520ab6b2491a51c849 839659 free/binary-armel/Packages
5add5ff8ac9afc39388adef4215d9687 422870 free/binary-armel/Packages.bz2
|
|
2010-01-21
, 00:48
|
|
Posts: 1,208 |
Thanked: 1,028 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#98
|
Originally Posted by fatalsaint
Are you referring ot ndi's post? I don't think that he posted to whole file. At least I didn't
Well.. at least I know my troubleshooting skills aren't failing me.
And his information appears to be missing certain key signatures.
ETA: Most notably,
bb8379d9be4884520ab6b2491a51c849 839659 free/binary-armel/Packages
5add5ff8ac9afc39388adef4215d9687 422870 free/binary-armel/Packages.bz2
|
|
2010-01-21
, 00:49
|
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#99
|
Originally Posted by mikkov
Ah.. ok then
Are you referring ot ndi's post? I don't think that he posted to whole file. At least I didn't
.ETA: You've got this.. you evidently have more information than me at this point. I'll go sit in a corner now
|
|
2010-01-21
, 00:50
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#100
|
Originally Posted by mikkov
That bug was fixed 2010-01-20 10:26:52 GMT+3. He's still having issues.
First one was clearly caused by this https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8286
Other ones look the same too, but the repositories should be fixed by now.
Also, happy 1000th post :P
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
That middle one is actually a good thread. They are on to something at the end regarding installing and then uninstalling an app.
NDI - Did you flash 1.1 or OTA update?
ETA: The OP of the second thread posted in the first thread as now "fixed". SO whatever this problem is, it isn't consistent and seems more related to the repositories than App Manager itself.. although I'm not sure how or why.
If I've helped you or you use any of my packages feel free to help me out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining:
pyRadio - Pandora Radio on your N900, N810 or N800!