Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 518 | Thanked: 160 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#11
Originally Posted by ViciousXUSMC View Post
Well you get what you pay for 3g cost over 2x as much as Edge, if they were the same cost then the argument would be a lot harder to say its ok to have "just edge" ...
If you're responding to me, directly, as a network/VoIP engineer, I'm very well aware of your point however I was providing the OP "real world" experiences, so a more informed decision can be made.

"Data rates" for Edge should be more than sufficient to handle a VoIP call, but again, the quality of signal doesn't seem up to snuff on AT&T, at least in my area (Balt/DC corridor).

Last edited by colnago; 2010-01-25 at 21:32.
 
Posts: 3,841 | Thanked: 1,079 times | Joined on Nov 2006
#12
To me 3G/3.5G is only slightly faster than 2G/2.5G, so it's not a deal breaker. Whether 3G or 2G I try to keep the amount of data as low as absolutely possible, because there's cost/megabyte to take into account.
__________________
N800/OS2007|N900/Maemo5
-- Metalayer-crawler delenda est.
-- Current state: Fed up with everything MeeGo.
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:52.