|
|
2010-01-31
, 03:27
|
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#61
|
|
|
2010-01-31
, 10:47
|
|
Posts: 268 |
Thanked: 304 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Orlando, USA
|
#62
|
|
|
2010-01-31
, 11:06
|
|
Posts: 138 |
Thanked: 103 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Southern Germany
|
#63
|
yea, no game changer here. microB offers a superior experience by far in terms of speed, features and performance.
|
|
2010-01-31
, 13:02
|
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#64
|
I am wondering what features that might be judging the number of available add-ins for fennec compared to microB.
And how the difference between speed and peformance is defined.
The only annoying thing left here is the startup time which is irrelevant if fennec is already open. Besides the latest fennec comes rather close to microB in terms
of performance and passes by regarding features. This is based on a frequent daily use. Of course ones mileage may vary.
|
|
2010-01-31
, 13:24
|
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#65
|
|
|
2010-01-31
, 13:30
|
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#66
|
|
|
2010-01-31
, 13:33
|
|
Posts: 29 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#67
|
|
|
2010-01-31
, 14:49
|
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#68
|
|
|
2010-01-31
, 15:09
|
|
|
Posts: 321 |
Thanked: 366 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Hellas
|
#70
|