good points.... these are the reasons why i left the "tablet" and went to something else.. surprised its not much after the update...

Having N900 for two months I've been very satisfied with this new device. Albeit having initial battery problems the positive sides clearly outweigh the negative sides. The community seems to provide fixes to small annoyances very quickly.

Wouu..Nice day to you also Let´s see what happened here:
So I answered to your question because clearly you didn't understand zwers answer. Sorry for that.

OP, Very good points all, much the same niggles I have. However, they do feel like very small problems, when you consider the awesomeness of the device as a whole. Not even blips on my radar really. It's a matter of priorities though.

Agreed, this is a major advantage of the open source model and a clear reason for my choice of this platform. However, one issue that's preventing more useful community solutions is the closed source nature of Nokia's s/w stack...

Mostly agreed. However, some of the idiosyncraties particularly the quirks with the mail client or the shortcomings with the calendar are really letting down what needs to become a viable contender against other polished platforms (you know the ones I'm talking about...)

For example, if I had to use the N900 professionally as opposed to as a hobby, I couldn't possibly, due to aforementioned shortcomings. This is where Nokia need to up the game. Let's see what the next f/w updates bring...

sxc I agree, I am running two phones for this very reason, I wonder how many people are?

if you click on the web page title (drop down menu at the top of the browser which is visible when not in full screen mode) then "reload" is a selectable option

I have been using my for 2 weeks and returned it for full refund. Why ? Because it makes no point to have all that great features in a device that can't survive a day without charging. In this case I prefer to stick with a real phone that will last more than a week + dedicated internet tablet, like my 1 year old N810 (or something new, there are so many of them in the market). That was the main reason why I returned it. Some minor ones:

- Device definitely too fat and heavy.
- The stand is a joke (Nokia, use proved solutions from N810).
- The screen less bright and less responsive than in N810 (and its smaller, but it is my personal preference to keep it over 4") - again, Nokia, use proved solutions from N810.
- Slider - much worse mechanism than for example in my SE W910i, it moves so easily in the trousers pockets.
- Hardware buttons are in my opinion upside down - lock should be swapped with headphone jack.
- Keyboard, again, Nokia, use proved solutions from N810... keyboard should be bigger, why only 3 rows instead of 4 ? Only the way how the key press is better now.
- Stylus - should be on the top, not on the bottom. Again, like in N810.

I am not going to write about all the advantages of N900 as you guys covered all of them many times Maemo 5 is the best mobile operating system in the market in my opinion, but put it together with all electronics in N810 case and increase battery life at least 3 times - then I will buy it. Probably as N910

The device is "too fat and heavy", but you still want it to be bigger and have a longer battery life?

EDIT: I'm not trying to bash you for taking it back - if it doesn't suit your needs, then I'm just glad you made a decision to take it back rather than just hanging around here whining about it. But if you're drawing up a list of requirements, you need to make sure they're not contradictory!