|
|
2010-02-12
, 16:12
|
|
|
Posts: 739 |
Thanked: 242 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Montreal
|
#12
|
|
|
2010-02-12
, 20:04
|
|
|
Posts: 474 |
Thanked: 368 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#13
|
|
|
2010-02-12
, 20:05
|
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#14
|
WTF!?
look at the thread you posted.
i made this benchmark with ALL of the browsers available (at this time) for the n900!!!
microb and firefox were somewhere at 15 - 20.
tear is at 55.
and midori is nearly hitting the 64 points!
so... please... read what you're posting before you post it... ^^
EDIT: for this test i didn't tweak anything. just installed the browser and made the test. so maybe tweaking around can improve the performance on these browsers.
|
|
2010-02-13
, 09:37
|
|
|
Posts: 474 |
Thanked: 368 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#15
|
|
|
2010-02-13
, 11:04
|
|
Posts: 1,224 |
Thanked: 1,763 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#16
|
|
|
2010-02-13
, 13:28
|
|
Posts: 1,224 |
Thanked: 1,763 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#18
|
|
|
2010-02-13
, 21:14
|
|
|
Posts: 474 |
Thanked: 368 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#19
|
look at the thread you posted.
i made this benchmark with ALL of the browsers available (at this time) for the n900!!!
microb and firefox were somewhere at 15 - 20.
tear is at 55.
and midori is nearly hitting the 64 points!
so... please... read what you're posting before you post it... ^^
EDIT: for this test i didn't tweak anything. just installed the browser and made the test. so maybe tweaking around can improve the performance on these browsers.
Last edited by b666m; 2010-02-12 at 15:49.