|
|
2010-03-03
, 05:06
|
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#62
|
|
|
2010-03-03
, 05:09
|
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#63
|
My opinion is that software editors should not sell their products by individual copies, but instead they should sell publication.
Say your firm developed a software which reached $1M in development. You want to sell it and would like to make $100K benefit, i.e. 10% profit.
Instead of trying to sell 100 thousand copies of software to 100 thousand of people at a price of $11 each, you should first publish some restricted version of the software in order to create demand and have the public realize its usefulness. Then you sell the publication of the complete program, for a price of $1.1M.
Potential buyers would have no choice but joining their money in order to obtain the software.
According to me this is the only way to sell digital data without threatening any legal proceeding.
|
|
2010-03-03
, 05:13
|
|
|
Posts: 733 |
Thanked: 991 times |
Joined on Dec 2008
|
#64
|
Ok.
So I will slip in a EULA (End User License Agreement) that forbids redistribution that you will have to agree to before you install/use my software.
I would also have copy of the EULA available on my website so you can read it before you pay for the software.
Am I (legally, ethically) protected from software piracy then?
|
|
2010-03-03
, 05:23
|
|
Posts: 16 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Paris, France
|
#65
|
In other words, you have a problem with the amount of profit that I make?
Do take into account the risk that I'm taking.
And the fact that you have no idea what my costs are.
|
|
2010-03-03
, 05:27
|
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#66
|
|
|
2010-03-03
, 05:29
|
|
Posts: 16 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Paris, France
|
#67
|
Ok.
So I will slip in a EULA (End User License Agreement) that forbids redistribution that you will have to agree to before you install/use my software.
I would also have copy of the EULA available on my website so you can read it before you pay for the software.
Am I (legally, ethically) protected from software piracy then?
|
|
2010-03-03
, 05:32
|
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#68
|
As far I am concerned I tend to avoid buying any software that has a EULA. And when I do most of the time it's because I didn't realize it was in it. I like to really own the things I own. So I don't buy these stuffs.
|
|
2010-03-03
, 05:41
|
|
Posts: 16 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Paris, France
|
#69
|
|
|
2010-03-03
, 05:47
|
|
Posts: 16 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Paris, France
|
#70
|
If were talking something tangible, like a car, if you sell it, you can't use it anymore.
If we are talking about something "virtual" like software, you could give away the disks and uninstall the software, and you would be in a similar situation to the car.
However, software can be duplicated, so you could give away a copy while retaining yours; which, in turn, would make ysss lose a potential customer.
That is why so many EULA forbid re-distribution.
Hola! Soy un Guía de Maemo!.
Vínculos interesantes si nos visitas por primera vez (en inglés): New members say hello , New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Si te puedo ayudar con cualquier otra cosa, sólo dilo!