|
|
2010-03-13
, 18:40
|
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#31
|
|
|
2010-03-13
, 19:03
|
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Espoo
|
#32
|
|
|
2010-03-15
, 15:55
|
|
Posts: 3,841 |
Thanked: 1,079 times |
Joined on Nov 2006
|
#33
|
At least feature-wise it shouldn't be that sad rpm is going to be chosen over deb. The package format itself isn't all that different. rpm just isn't kosher for some hippies
|
|
2010-03-16
, 17:02
|
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Espoo
|
#34
|
The package formats are actually entirely different.
What's not so different is how it works as seen from an end user's point of view. So end users are fine in any case. The developers may still want a say, because from the developer's point of view there are differences that matters, depending on what you do.