Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    Battery consumption analysis

    Reply
    Page 18 of 22 | Prev | 8   16     17   18   19     20   | Next | Last
    xav | # 171 | 2010-03-19, 16:29 | Report

    Originally Posted by low life View Post
    Maybe try disabling the IM accounts one by one to find out which of them are so power hungry - I'm using only Pecan MSN and when idling it barely consumes more battery with IM enabled than when offline.
    OK, I've done a some tests over a few days. Apparently MSN Pecan is a power sucker, the only one which works well without obvious effect on the battery life is gmail.

    See attached screenshots for more info. In order:
    - MSN (Pecan) + All Jabber accounts (gmail+jabber+ovi) + yahoo + skype
    - MSN + ALL Jabber
    - MSN alone
    - gmail alone (note that one is screenshooted a bit earlier so you still see the charging period, ignore it)
    - no IM at all

    obviously gmail alone works well, the others suck power. AIM and ICQ don't work at all (they always say something like "network error"). Facebook-chat seems broken recently. I don't have accounts to try the other ones.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    Attached Images
         
    The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to xav For This Useful Post:
    bugelrex, cazzajay, jpala16

     
    low life | # 172 | 2010-03-19, 17:31 | Report

    My graph using MSN-Pecan 0.1.0 final (over 2G) looks pretty much the same as your gmail graph.. which pecan version is that? I'm not sure if the final is in extras yet, as mine is from extras-testing. I think there were some problems with battery consumption in the release candidate versions.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    xav | # 173 | 2010-03-19, 20:25 | Report

    I'm using 0.1.0-0maemo2. I'm over 3G, for pecan and gmail (and everything else).

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    b666m | # 174 | 2010-03-24, 15:32 | Report

    something new:



    - left side: normal idle battery consumption PR1.1.1

    - right side: first red dot -> activated smartreflex, second red dot -> seems to work

    something about smartreflex: https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?...ltiple&id=7633

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    zimon | # 175 | 2010-03-24, 15:35 | Report

    Originally Posted by mooninite View Post
    With SmartReflex enabled I've seen an extra day of battery. Up to 3 days without needing a recharge. This is with light usage and only one or two short calls.
    I just tried that SmartReflex hack yesteday. It worked fine, until today (just one hour ago) N900 crashed and booted.

    Code:
    $ cat /proc/bootreason 
    32wd_to
    What else (logs) would be helpfull to know if the reason was SamrtReflex or something else?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    spanner | # 176 | 2010-03-24, 16:01 | Report

    Originally Posted by zimon View Post
    What else (logs) would be helpfull to know if the reason was SamrtReflex or something else?
    I don't think there are any, but: you can be pretty sure it was SmartReflex. Many people can't enable SR without getting 32wd_to crashes.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    gabby131 | # 177 | 2010-03-24, 16:03 | Report

    @b666m

    currently searching what "smartreflex" is and do. but if you can tell me it is greatly appreciated.

    EDIT: whooops!!! there is a link!!!! sorry, thanks!!

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    les_garten | # 178 | 2010-03-24, 16:05 | Report

    Originally Posted by spanner View Post
    I don't think there are any, but: you can be pretty sure it was SmartReflex. Many people can't enable SR without getting 32wd_to crashes.
    I enabled it yesterday and had a reboot within minutes and I never get those, so it's turned back off.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Rob1n | # 179 | 2010-03-24, 16:08 | Report

    Originally Posted by spanner View Post
    I don't think there are any, but: you can be pretty sure it was SmartReflex. Many people can't enable SR without getting 32wd_to crashes.
    I've had it enabled for several weeks now without a single crash. Guess I'm just lucky

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    zimon | # 180 | 2010-03-24, 16:21 | Report

    Originally Posted by spanner View Post
    I don't think there are any, but: you can be pretty sure it was SmartReflex. Many people can't enable SR without getting 32wd_to crashes.
    I will try later if I can reproduce the bug.
    I had ....well read the report:

    https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7633#c31

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 18 of 22 | Prev | 8   16     17   18   19     20   | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout