|
|
2010-03-23
, 21:44
|
|
|
Posts: 1,091 |
Thanked: 323 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ ~
|
#2
|
|
|
2010-03-23
, 21:50
|
|
Posts: 3,664 |
Thanked: 1,529 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Hamilton, New Zealand
|
#3
|
|
|
2010-03-23
, 22:10
|
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ uy
|
#4
|
....
Also remember that: N900 Maemo5 is still on an ongoing maintaining and no where near its optimum state yet.
|
|
2010-03-23
, 22:21
|
|
Posts: 3,664 |
Thanked: 1,529 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Hamilton, New Zealand
|
#5
|
yes, i thought that.
still those numbers are from nokia themselves, i think they did they best to achive the longest talk time possible.
i guess it leaves room for improvement
how much time do you guys get form watching lets say an avi movie cd size...?
still, getting the longest time possible no apps, only 2g connection...
thank you guys for your quick reply!
anyways these bad boy is much better than my last phone, a qtek ppc with winmo 6.5![]()
cheers
|
|
2010-03-23
, 23:01
|
|
Posts: 4 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ uy
|
#6
|
|
|
2010-03-24
, 01:29
|
|
Posts: 86 |
Thanked: 52 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#7
|
I'am waiting for my n900 to come.
But I just noticed that the battery lasts less on this nokia than on any other ti omap phone.
examples according official data
/-->with 2g phone calls
-N900 6.5 hrs
-iphone 3gs 12hrs
-satio 11hrs (smaller battery 1000mah)
-droid is the same
-omnia hd 13hrs bigger bat 1500mah
should it get at least over 10 hrs?
/-->3g talk times are roughly the same considering the different batteries and phone's configurations
/-->standby times
n900 getting the shortest times
but not too far from iphone 3gs
all the rest are up.
and so on....
is it maemo not being power efficent?
the only difference i can think of is the swap memory.
while talking it should have screen off and system to lower power consumption. also at stand by...
what do you think guys?
and hello maemo!!!!