|
|
2010-03-26
, 19:25
|
|
|
Posts: 670 |
Thanked: 359 times |
Joined on May 2007
|
#2
|
|
|
2010-03-26
, 20:07
|
|
|
Posts: 115 |
Thanked: 136 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Central Ohio
|
#3
|
|
|
2010-03-26
, 21:30
|
|
Posts: 198 |
Thanked: 76 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#4
|
|
|
2010-03-27
, 13:26
|
|
|
Posts: 1,030 |
Thanked: 792 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
|
#5
|
|
|
2010-03-27
, 15:16
|
|
Posts: 1,341 |
Thanked: 708 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#6
|
|
|
2010-03-27
, 23:37
|
|
Posts: 198 |
Thanked: 76 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#7
|
|
|
2010-06-06
, 14:00
|
|
Posts: 15 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Melbourne, Australia
|
#8
|
all in all i counted almost a thousand (1000!) l10n packages -- with respect to the space issues that seems totally ridiculous to me.
what's more, besides
cscz, dadk, dede, engb, enus, eses, esmx, fifi, frca, frfr, itit, nlnl, nono, plpl, ptpt, ruru, svse
there's even
mr0
supposedly a meta package -- but for issues like l10n, meta packages in debian are supposed to depend on only _one_ of the above, not all.
so, if you try to deinstall, say, skype-ui-l10n-cscz it removes -mr0 and -mr0 in turn all other -l10n and that in turn everything else of skype (same for all other apps with that exhaustive list of l10n packages).
well, the question is fairly obvious: how does one get rid of all those useless l10n packages?
is there an SOP?
i could, of course, edit /var/lib/dpkg/status or try equivs (no luck so far, for some reason the actual _filename_ of the package matters, not the Provides header)
ps: tried to file a bug in bugzilla, but some genius decided, you need yet another account for bugzilla ... apparently too hard to get a joint auth infrastructure for all of *.maemo.org?