|
|
2010-03-31
, 10:46
|
|
|
Posts: 2,121 |
Thanked: 1,540 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Oxford, UK
|
#82
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to pelago For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-03-31
, 11:04
|
|
Posts: 1,255 |
Thanked: 393 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ US
|
#83
|
Rushmore, I agree that there are a lot of things in this phone that people are surprised to not see, including portrait SMS.
On the other hand, back at when we speculated if it'd be a phone or not, I for one thought that Maemo 4 didn't bode well for a phone OS. With no phone functionality, no PIM, no anything that might make it an overlapping product with existing Nokia phones. I think for a "first phone", they did okay. There were lots of phone centric things that had to be designed from scratch. Which they do not have to do with Symbian phones.
So, I believe there are a lot of unrealistic expectations plus I am surprised they marketed it like they did - a "superphone". It was bound to create discontent. This is, for all purposes, a product directly comparable with the "Google Developer Phone"... In my opinion. You didn't see many end users running around with the first Android phone, and that was probably a wise marketing decision until they had it more ready for mass market.
Nokia jumped into it with the N900.
|
|
2010-03-31
, 15:09
|
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Verona, Italy
|
#84
|
"Couple of hours work" haha! I'd like portrait SMS too, but it would take longer than that, I'm sure.
| The Following User Says Thank You to maurelio79 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-03-31
, 16:21
|
|
|
Posts: 327 |
Thanked: 249 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Λεμεσιανός, ρε!
|
#85
|
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=136
Ok, maybe not 2 hours... on day? a couple of day? I mean it's so impossible to do? I can not belive it....

|
|
2010-03-31
, 17:07
|
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Verona, Italy
|
#86
|
|
|
2010-03-31
, 17:11
|
|
|
Posts: 327 |
Thanked: 249 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Λεμεσιανός, ρε!
|
#87
|
I know... i'm totaly agree with you, buuuut and again... is it impossible? i understand that there are more important things: but like we had portrait browser a little buggy for some months, we can also have portrait SMS a little buggy for some months and with our feedback help nokia to improve, am i wrong?
I do not understand problem with existing messages, it is only a gui: i'm speaking about rotate a window and rearrange the content.
|
|
2010-03-31
, 20:24
|
|
|
Posts: 2,121 |
Thanked: 1,540 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Oxford, UK
|
#88
|
|
|
2010-03-31
, 20:31
|
|
|
Posts: 290 |
Thanked: 165 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#89
|
|
|
2010-03-31
, 21:10
|
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Verona, Italy
|
#90
|
for me that would be a nice step, to read the sms in portrait. the internal big screen.
![]() |
| Tags |
| disappointment imminent, search are the suck |
| Thread Tools | |
|
On the other hand, back at when we speculated if it'd be a phone or not, I for one thought that Maemo 4 didn't bode well for a phone OS. With no phone functionality, no PIM, no anything that might make it an overlapping product with existing Nokia phones. I think for a "first phone", they did okay. There were lots of phone centric things that had to be designed from scratch. Which they do not have to do with Symbian phones.
So, I believe there are a lot of unrealistic expectations plus I am surprised they marketed it like they did - a "superphone". It was bound to create discontent. This is, for all purposes, a product directly comparable with the "Google Developer Phone"... In my opinion. You didn't see many end users running around with the first Android phone, and that was probably a wise marketing decision until they had it more ready for mass market.
Nokia jumped into it with the N900.
Last edited by volt; 2010-03-31 at 08:18.