Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password
    Poll: Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!
    Poll Options
    Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!
    View Poll Results

    Overclock the N900?

    Reply
    Page 22 of 536 | Prev | 12   20     21   22   23     24   32 | Next | Last
    Lehto | # 211 | 2010-04-03, 11:34 | Report

    I didnt increase voltage. So far I've tested a lot of different applications that require heavy cpu calculating power and in short 10-15min bursts I've yet to notice any misbehaviour @ 950mhz. The phone is now so smooth acting, but for how long?

    I dont encourage anyone to run at faster than stock clockspeeds. Actually I should say (just to cover my back) that one should never run it past 600mhz.




    Originally Posted by jsomby View Post
    So is there any easy way to speed up to 800MHz looking from user who knows linux, but isn't that familiar by itself?

    I'll upload the kernel files for 650,700,750,800,825,850,900 somewhere once I've determined my phone wont fry. I dont consider it nice behaviour to upload hazardous files on the internet.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by Lehto; 2010-04-03 at 11:37.
    The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Lehto For This Useful Post:
    b-man, biggzy, buxz777, euanandrews, Faz, hqh, jsomby, kmare, NvyUs, Stonik, tissot, Venemo

     
    jsomby | # 212 | 2010-04-03, 11:40 | Report

    That would be nice. I certainly would try those up to 800MHz. Not sure is it wise, but hey... who frakking cares!

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    plaban | # 213 | 2010-04-03, 11:44 | Report

    I'll try 650 or 700mhz to be safe.I want to know about the kinetic scrolling,is more smooth now?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Lehto | # 214 | 2010-04-03, 11:48 | Report

    Originally Posted by plaban View Post
    I'll try 650 or 700mhz to be safe.I want to know about the kinetic scrolling,is more smooth now?
    In one word. Yes.



    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Lehto For This Useful Post:
    b-man, biggzy, buxz777, dashti, euanandrews, Faz, giannoug, plaban, tissot, titi974, Venemo

     
    buxz777 | # 215 | 2010-04-03, 11:51 | Report

    pm sent back lehto mate thanks

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    roundyz | # 216 | 2010-04-03, 11:52 | Report

    this should be linked on engadget, see how much they dumb it down.topworkthough,welldon!

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    hawaii | # 217 | 2010-04-03, 11:54 | Report

    subscribed.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Flandry | # 218 | 2010-04-03, 11:56 | Report

    I'm actually more interested in what happens if you drop the maximum to 500 or 550 (and ideally reduce the voltage if possible). I get about 50% more battery life out of my laptop with a PentiumM processor using NHC to reduce its max to 1.4 GHz from 1.6 and reducing the voltage for all clock steps, and the difference in performance is negligible.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    tissot | # 219 | 2010-04-03, 11:58 | Report

    Thanks alot Lehto for the files. Yes i know how the flasher works..

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Matan | # 220 | 2010-04-03, 12:02 | Report

    Another thing that might be worth trying is to run 600MHz at OPP3 instead of OPP5. It might be out of spec, but Pandora people report that it is stable and it might save some battery if your processor spends a lot of time at this frequency.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to Matan For This Useful Post:
    Flandry

     
    Page 22 of 536 | Prev | 12   20     21   22   23     24   32 | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout