The Following User Says Thank You to mebob For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2007-07-12
, 22:40
|
Posts: 19 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#2
|
|
2007-07-12
, 23:32
|
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Aug 2006
@ Monroe, La
|
#3
|
|
2007-07-13
, 02:51
|
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Aug 2006
@ Monroe, La
|
#5
|
|
2007-07-29
, 01:34
|
Posts: 130 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Maine & Florida - USA
|
#6
|
|
2007-07-29
, 04:49
|
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Aug 2006
@ Monroe, La
|
#7
|
I've been looking at the i.Trek GPS's and I've seen people mentions that the M5+ and M6 would work. Since, they seem compact and newegg has them with good shipping prices I think I'll give on of them a try.
http://www.itrekgps.com/Bluetooth%20...oth%20GPS.html
Since there return policy is very good, I want to make sure i'm getting a good one. So, I was wondering if anyone had any input as to which one is better?
The M5+ seems to be better but I think I might be missing some thing because it is the cheaper of the two. Does the M6's SiRF Star III chipset outway the M5+'s extra channels and battery features?
Thanks!