|
|
2010-04-09
, 07:26
|
|
|
Posts: 579 |
Thanked: 286 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Australia
|
#1871
|
|
|
2010-04-09
, 07:26
|
|
Posts: 1,224 |
Thanked: 1,763 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#1872
|
Hmm... You should stick to the previous kernel that worked for you, at least for now, until Lehto/titan/Matan comes up with a better ulv kernel.
(I'm waiting for a 250-900 ulv kernel, like everyone else)
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Matan For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-04-09
, 07:31
|
|
Posts: 24 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#1873
|
|
|
2010-04-09
, 07:45
|
|
Posts: 273 |
Thanked: 113 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Germany
|
#1874
|
Maybe a fiasco one to save typing when flashing?
Lehto, may I ask you to please do such a thing (if not fiasco, no problem)?
Please click 'Thanks!' if this post was helpful.
|
|
2010-04-09
, 07:51
|
|
Posts: 169 |
Thanked: 41 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Portugal
|
#1875
|

|
|
2010-04-09
, 08:09
|
|
|
Posts: 46 |
Thanked: 26 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Makati, Philippines
|
#1876
|
There is no "better ulv kernel". Each individual OMAP has its own lowest voltage in which it will work reliably at a given frequency.
TI only promise that 600MHz works at 1.35V (OPP5), but my device (and most others) also work at 1.2V (OPP3) - but some don't, and no kernel change will make them work. If you have such device, you can try 1.275V (OPP4) and probably some intermediate voltage levels. Similarly for other frequencies.
So probably the appropriate phrase isn't "a better ulv kernel."
Maybe "a suitable ulv kernel" -- a set of kernels with different voltage levels, starting with OPP3 -- that is, If only there's a way to determine the minimum reliable voltage for a certain N900 CPU without doing trial-and-error. (Although if there's no choice, I'll be willing to do just that.
)
I'll try to give some feedback for this kernel.

|
|
2010-04-09
, 08:10
|
|
|
Posts: 2,368 |
Thanked: 3,754 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Berlin - Love this city!!
|
#1877
|
|
|
2010-04-09
, 08:11
|
|
|
Posts: 664 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Australia
|
#1878
|
but have never gone beyond 950 though and absolutely loving it.. thanks
|
|
2010-04-09
, 08:16
|
|
Posts: 49 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Tn
|
#1879
|
|
|
2010-04-09
, 08:23
|
|
Posts: 72 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Finland
|
#1880
|
![]() |
|