|
|
2010-04-09
, 10:50
|
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,490 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#261
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-04-09
, 12:04
|
|
Posts: 670 |
Thanked: 367 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#262
|
|
|
2010-04-09
, 13:42
|
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,490 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#263
|
How much additional disk space is the community SSU taking up for you guys?
so I'm down to about 20 MB free.
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-04-09
, 18:16
|
|
|
Posts: 1,137 |
Thanked: 402 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Catalunya
|
#264
|
|
|
2010-04-09
, 18:48
|
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#265
|
I'm not sure why, but there is some binary bloat simply by rebuilding the packages in the Diablo SDK :-(
For example, the default 5.2008.43-7 busybox (1.6.1.legal-1osso16) is:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 228792 Sep 18 2008 /bin/busybox
| The Following User Says Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-04-09
, 19:06
|
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,490 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#266
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to lma For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-04-10
, 06:09
|
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#267
|
That was my first thought too but the busybox binary in the .deb is identical to the one in the jffs2 image.
| The Following User Says Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-04-10
, 06:18
|
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,490 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#268
|
Prelink is done as a post-image-generation process - it goes in and runs it on the file system after putting in all the packages, effectively modifying the binaries.
|
|
2010-04-10
, 06:48
|
|
|
Posts: 1,671 |
Thanked: 11,478 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Warsaw, Poland
|
#269
|
Exactly, so if prelink was the cause the /bin/busybox binary in busybox_3%3a1.6.1.legal-1osso16_armel.deb would be larger than the one in the rootfs part of the FIASCO image.
I suppose there could also be something hinky in my Diablo SDK installation, it would be nice if someone else could verify the size discrepancy.
|
|
2010-04-10
, 06:56
|
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,490 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#270
|
Strictly speaking, busybox in SDK doesn't have to be the same actual deb package as was used to build the image.
![]() |
| Tags |
| backintime, diablo cssu, diablo turbo |
| Thread Tools | |
|