Active Topics
-
Facebook chat on Nokia N9 - back to life :) (41)
to MeeGo / Harmattan by shakolan - 19 hrs, 37 mins ago -
Any chance to get back mirror.thecust.net ? (3)
to MeeGo / Harmattan by dredlok706 - 19 hrs, 48 mins ago -
TLS 1.2 for N9 is ready (17)
to MeeGo / Harmattan by shakolan - 21 hrs, 19 mins ago -
Pinephone and Pinephone Pro on Leste vs Mobian (0)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by biketool - 1 day, 3 hrs ago -
need .bin for update nokia 770 tablet (17)
to Nokia 770 by amigo157 - 6 days ago -
I have found alien dalvik rpm (3)
to SailfishOS by HtheB - 6 days, 9 hrs ago - more...
|
2010-04-11
, 22:12
|
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Plymouth, Minnesota
|
#2382
|
Originally Posted by Ronaldo
are you running pr 1.1?? I'm on 1.1.1 does that matter? I don't understand what I'm doing wrong sry if I'm turning this into a whinefest lol I'm doing everything right and it doesn't work........
depends which file u dropped, if its 900 then make sure command includes 900 and not 800
|
|
2010-04-11
, 22:13
|
|
Posts: 113 |
Thanked: 26 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#2383
|
Originally Posted by eitama
Those are functions in the vi program.
There are many commands that don't start with ":"
For example : n for next
"/" to search
"G" to go to line etc etc.
: is required for commands. Plus (if I remember correctly) it forces write and quit (in the case of ":wq")
|
|
2010-04-11
, 22:29
|
|
Posts: 946 |
Thanked: 1,650 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#2384
|
Originally Posted by arbitrabbit
if this is correct and current = approx frequency * voltage^2 then
Okay, I have done some extensive calculations and base voltage is 0.6v (VDD1 OFF) and each increment after that is equal to 0.0125V. So 0x1e equates to 0.975v
Code:
stock: 1e = 0.975V x 125 MHz = 119 26 = 1.075V x 250 MHz = 289 30 = 1.200V x 500 MHz = 720 36 = 1.275V x 550 MHz = 894 3c = 1.350V x 600 MHz = 1094 3c = 1.350V x 720 MHz = 1312 overclocked: 3c = 1.350V x 750 MHz = 1367 3c = 1.350V x 810 MHz = 1476 3c = 1.350V x 850 MHz = 1549 3c = 1.350V x 900 MHz = 1640 3c = 1.350V x 950 MHz = 1731 ideal kernel: 1e = 0.975V x 500 MHz = 475 21 = 1.012V x 550 MHz = 564 26 = 1.075V x 600 MHz = 693 2d = 1.163V x 700 MHz = 946 2d = 1.163V x 750 MHz = 1014 30 = 1.200V x 810 MHz = 1166 30 = 1.200V x 850 MHz = 1224 36 = 1.275V x 900 MHz = 1463 36 = 1.275V x 950 MHz = 1544 3c = 1.350V x 1000 MHz = 1823 43 = 1.438V x 1100 MHz = 2273 48 = 1.500V x 1150 MHz = 2588
|
|
2010-04-11
, 22:37
|
|
Posts: 171 |
Thanked: 114 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#2385
|
Originally Posted by titan
Yup...though of course it is the idle time which would have the biggest impact, which is what you are increasing by increasing the frequency. So while running, your calculations make sense but in reality, ideal@810 should consume less power than stock.
if this is correct and current = approx so 810@ideal approx 600@stock
|
|
2010-04-11
, 22:39
|
|
Posts: 946 |
Thanked: 1,650 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#2386
|
Originally Posted by arbitrabbit
sure. it's just the max. current that could damage the chip. so the damage would not be larger than with 600@stock.
Yup...though of course it is the idle time which would have the biggest impact, which is what you are increasing by increasing the frequency. So while running, your calculations make sense but in reality, ideal@810 should consume less power than stock.
|
|
2010-04-11
, 22:41
|
|
Posts: 171 |
Thanked: 114 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#2387
|
Originally Posted by titan
Ah yes, make sense
sure. it's just the max. current that could damage the chip. so the damage would not be larger than with 600@stock.
|
|
2010-04-11
, 22:41
|
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#2388
|
just OC'd mine,
the re-flash took 'bout 1.5 secs only. I thought the re-flash was unsuccessful, but according to healthcheck app, my device is running at Freq 800MHz.
does this mean the OC is a success?
the re-flash took 'bout 1.5 secs only. I thought the re-flash was unsuccessful, but according to healthcheck app, my device is running at Freq 800MHz.
does this mean the OC is a success?
|
|
2010-04-11
, 22:53
|
|
Posts: 171 |
Thanked: 114 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#2389
|
Originally Posted by titan
A similar relationship exists for heat generated as well...so serious OC would probably kill the chip due to excess heat.
sure. it's just the max. current that could damage the chip. so the damage would not be larger than with 600@stock.
Even the Droid guys have come to the same conclusion that c. 800MHz is the maximum safe frequency to operate this chip.
By the way, battery life improvement by running ideal kernel within [500,850] is quite remarkable.
Last edited by arbitrabbit; 2010-04-11 at 23:03.
|
|
2010-04-11
, 22:56
|
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Plymouth, Minnesota
|
#2390
|
Finally!!! Figured it out thanks to Ronaldo for helping me out, cheers mate :-)
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:15.
Not sure, I'm using Lehto's 800 Mhz ulv atm.