Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password
    Poll: Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!
    Poll Options
    Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!
    View Poll Results

    Overclock the N900?

    Reply
    Page 262 of 536 | Prev | 252   260     261   262   263     264   272 | Next | Last
    arbitrabbit | # 2611 | 2010-04-13, 11:27 | Report

    Originally Posted by titan View Post
    I'd rather have an automatic reboot loop detection.
    for example, it could check for a file /etc/lastboot:
    if it doesn't exist, create i
    if it exists its modification time is < 2min ago it would only apply stock settings,
    otherwise create/update it and apply user settings.

    the only problem: brokenbox..er..busybux does not have "stat -t", find doesnt support
    --mmin. how can we compare file times?
    Using awk. systime() and ls -l to get modification time and then using strftime to compare the two

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to arbitrabbit For This Useful Post:
    Faz

     
    gabby131 | # 2612 | 2010-04-13, 11:33 | Report

    Originally Posted by shrubbery View Post
    First off - a big thank you to everyone who has contributed to the N900 overclocking scene

    Would somebody mind explaining why the titan ideal kernel has the min and max frequencies set to 500 and 850 respectively? (instead of say 250 and 1000) Does the 500MHz idle mode not consume more power then than 250MHz?
    well the low 125mhz has encountered some problems to some people,

    i use a different kernel but i hve 125/900mhz voltage, so far everything is fine

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to gabby131 For This Useful Post:
    shrubbery

     
    titan | # 2613 | 2010-04-13, 11:35 | Report

    for script authors: please add your email or TMO account URL to the script.
    I don't want to receive support requests for them. thanks

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to titan For This Useful Post:
    firstknight

     
    nokian-series | # 2614 | 2010-04-13, 11:52 | Report

    Originally Posted by nokian-series View Post
    What are your\correct values for it?

    Here http://wiki.maemo.org/Overclocking it says the default config to 'pmconfig file' .

    It says:
    clocks_off_while_idle 1
    voltage_off_while_idle 1

    But i have:
    clocks_off_while_idle 0
    voltage_off_while_idle 0

    Please Anyone can help me?
    Again..What the meaning of those values? Should i change them to 1 ? How did they get 0 if i dont change them?

    Thank you

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by nokian-series; 2010-04-13 at 11:54. Reason: Missing Information

     
    lucas777 | # 2615 | 2010-04-13, 12:22 | Report

    Question for those running this at 900Mhz is it possible for any of you to install Windows XP now or Windows ME at a decent speed? Even 95 or 98 would there be much diffrence... 300Mhz could make a huge diffrence..

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    arbitrabbit | # 2616 | 2010-04-13, 12:42 | Report

    Originally Posted by nokian-series View Post
    Again..What the meaning of those values? Should i change them to 1 ? How did they get 0 if i dont change them? Thank you
    Changing these values to 1 would turn on SmartReflex, a power management feature. For majority of the people, it causes N900 to become unstable but if it works, it increases battery life. To be fair, if you are using the XLV kernel, you would get limited benefit our of it

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    miwalter | # 2617 | 2010-04-13, 12:43 | Report

    Originally Posted by arbitrabbit View Post
    Changing these values to 1 would turn on SmartReflex, a power management feature. For majority of the people, it causes N900 to become unstable but if it works, it increases battery life. To be fair, if you are using the XLV kernel, you would get limited benefit our of it
    No.

    These values are not the smartreflex ones.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    titan | # 2618 | 2010-04-13, 12:51 | Report

    please let me know whether the upgrade worked fine
    or whether you had problems. I'm waiting for your feedback before I promote it to testing.

    Originally Posted by titan View Post
    some people seem to have problems upgrading to maemo22.
    I have no idea why. maybe the modules are not upgraded?

    If you used one one of my experimental kernels (not the ones from extras-*)
    I recommend the following:
    * create a backup!
    * reset pmconfig to defaults (125/600)
    * reinstall the original kernel and remove kernel-maemo kernel-modules-maemo
    apt-get install --reinstall kernel kernel-flasher
    apt-get remove kernel-maemo kernel-modules-maemo
    then install kernel-flasher-maemo again
    apt-get install kernel-modules-maemo
    alternatively you could upgrade on the command line and check whether there are any error messages:
    apt-get upgrade

    in the worst case just reflashing the original kernel over USB should be sufficient
    Code:
    flasher-3.5 -u -F RX-51_2009SE_3.2010.02-8_PR_COMBINED_MR0_ARM.bin
    sudo flasher-3.5 -f -k zImage -R

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    maxximum | # 2619 | 2010-04-13, 13:12 | Report

    Maemo22 worked like a charm for me.

    Had trouble from 19 to 20, did 21 in xterm. 22 from app.manager with no problem. Running the event.d-script and everything working great so far.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    nokian-series | # 2620 | 2010-04-13, 13:13 | Report

    Originally Posted by miwalter View Post
    No.

    These values are not the smartreflex ones.
    Yes, those are not the smartreflex ones..so..what are they..and..how did they get '0' :S

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 262 of 536 | Prev | 252   260     261   262   263     264   272 | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout