|
|
2010-04-28
, 01:18
|
|
|
Posts: 2,351 |
Thanked: 5,243 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#2
|
|
|
2010-04-28
, 01:25
|
|
Posts: 3,664 |
Thanked: 1,529 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Hamilton, New Zealand
|
#3
|
Hi, sorry for being quite picky lately but just couldn't stop wondering why?? as Xperia X10 has the same thing rendered smoothly and perfectly, so thought of putting it here:
I was doing the browser speed test on my n900 and until now it was alright but when I saw the same page rendered in X10 so perfectly(Photo of it when browsed via n900 below) I was like.. WTF!! And now I'm thinking if its the same reason why the youtube videos in the webpage look kinda pixelated(big visible square pixel like boxes-sorry if I couldn't make it clear) as the same video while played in computer doesn't have anything like that.
N900 screen below: (but all colors smoothly displayed in X10 - no any those horizontal effects)
|
|
2010-04-28
, 01:51
|
|
|
Posts: 664 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Australia
|
#4
|
). Ok, so its confirm that N900 uses just 65K color? Oh I've been let down here then but don't want to point anyone in particular but again: wasn't it written 16M everywhere coz I don't remember seeing anywhere written 65K or sth similar until now!!!
|
|
2010-04-28
, 02:05
|
|
Posts: 3,664 |
Thanked: 1,529 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Hamilton, New Zealand
|
#5
|
thanks javispedro and maxximuscool for the replies. But X10 also has 65K color as of gsmarena.com so guess it does a better job at dethering(whatever that is). Ok, so its confirm that N900 uses just 65K color? Oh I've been let down here then but don't want to point anyone in particular but again: wasn't it written 16M everywhere coz I don't remember seeing anywhere written 65K or sth similar until now!!!
On top of above, the whole page(evey web page) seems lot fainter than in X10. Sorry, but I was so proud of the display but now I'm bit hesitated "NOKIA"
|
|
2010-04-28
, 02:07
|
|
|
Posts: 2,351 |
Thanked: 5,243 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#6
|

| The Following User Says Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-04-28
, 02:10
|
|
Posts: 193 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#7
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to m165 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-04-28
, 03:31
|
|
|
Posts: 664 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Australia
|
#8
|
|
|
2010-04-28
, 09:12
|
|
|
Posts: 1,665 |
Thanked: 1,649 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Praha, Czech Republic
|
#9
|
|
|
2010-05-01
, 01:35
|
|
|
Posts: 664 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Australia
|
#10
|
Will that make browsing in general slower? Will others complain then? Is it such a big issue? Is CPU power unlimited?
Just wondering...
though may not be as fast to challenge 1GHz but though some other factor like lesser pixels to render than X10 might help it maintain the speed, coz if could be done then this web exerience thing could be made even better esp. flash video playbacks. But my awfully limited knowledge might be stopping me from realising other greater problems here, then again I'm just wondering too
. It implies to even standalone flash player apps coz after watching flash video in X10 I was really broken hearted
So, I wouldn't say its a big issue but would be awesome if could be improved letting us watch flash videos as they are and not with all those bandings.
I was doing the browser speed test on my n900 and until now it was alright but when I saw the same page rendered in X10 so perfectly(Photo of it when browsed via n900 below) I was like.. WTF!! And now I'm thinking if its the same reason why the youtube videos in the webpage look kinda pixelated(big visible square pixel like boxes-sorry if I couldn't make it clear
N900 screen below: (but all colors smoothly displayed in X10 - no any those horizontal effects)