|
|
2010-04-22
, 05:51
|
|
|
Posts: 1,389 |
Thanked: 1,857 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Israel
|
#171
|
|
|
2010-04-22
, 13:27
|
|
Posts: 252 |
Thanked: 252 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#172
|
|
|
2010-04-22
, 16:03
|
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,309 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#173
|
|
|
2010-04-22
, 16:11
|
|
Posts: 252 |
Thanked: 252 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#174
|
|
|
2010-04-23
, 09:27
|
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,309 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#175
|
and pushed these to the svn-repo now

About libdmtx, that is really great news! While you're at it, send the developer some great thank-yous for making that library open source!
|
|
2010-04-29
, 14:06
|
|
Posts: 106 |
Thanked: 52 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Corfe Castle, Dorset, UK
|
#176
|
|
|
2010-04-29
, 22:29
|
|
Posts: 252 |
Thanked: 252 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#177
|
I've had a good play with this alongside my friends motorola milestone using zxing and I feel that zxing is a better program for a number of reasons.

I find the UI in zxing to be far more intuitive and generally nicer. I like the way that you don't have to click scan to capture a code, I like the way it does this automatically.
When you say you don't have to click scan first, does that mean the application starts with the scanner running?
Is there any way to improve the camera autofocus drive algorithm in mbarcode, again compared with the performance of zxing on the milestone, mbarcode is somewhat lacking in my experience.
How about making the camera display fullscreen with overlayed info? I have seen this done with the theodolite app for the iPhone, and it makes for a far more pleasurable user experience in my opinion...

zxing is much faster an recognising barcodes, and gives you feedback whilst it's attempting to do so. Might be an idea?
Please don't take these suggestions as a complaint, I don't intend it to be anything like that, it's just my observations of what the 'competition' are offering.
Always a good thing to get some input on how things are working and what improvements could be made.
I don't know how big the dev team behind both of these apps are so It could be that zxing just have much more programming resources on they're hands, so again if this is the case and I'm just not well informed then I apologise!
but you are right about the number of developers. mbarcode currently has two active developers (me and lardman) who are working on it on our spare time. ZXing is backed by Google and appearantly has at least 17 people involved in the project:

|
|
2010-04-29
, 22:33
|
|
Posts: 252 |
Thanked: 252 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#178
|
|
|
2010-04-30
, 10:38
|
|
Posts: 2,102 |
Thanked: 1,309 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#179
|

I've had a good play with this alongside my friends motorola milestone using zxing and I feel that zxing is a better program for a number of reasons.
I find the UI in zxing to be far more intuitive and generally nicer. I like the way that you don't have to click scan to capture a code, I like the way it does this automatically.
Is there any way to improve the camera autofocus drive algorithm in mbarcode, again compared with the performance of zxing on the milestone, mbarcode is somewhat lacking in my experience.
How about making the camera display fullscreen with overlayed info? I have seen this done with the theodolite app for the iPhone, and it makes for a far more pleasurable user experience in my opinion...
zxing is much faster an recognising barcodes, and gives you feedback whilst it's attempting to do so. Might be an idea?
Please don't take these suggestions as a complaint, I don't intend it to be anything like that, it's just my observations of what the 'competition' are offering.

|
|
2010-04-30
, 20:41
|
|
Posts: 106 |
Thanked: 52 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ Corfe Castle, Dorset, UK
|
#180
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| barcode, camera, mbarcode |
| Thread Tools | |
|