![]() |
2010-05-04
, 19:28
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#52
|
The Following User Says Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-05-04
, 19:31
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#53
|
![]() |
2010-05-04
, 19:34
|
Posts: 472 |
Thanked: 442 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#54
|
![]() |
2010-05-04
, 19:39
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#55
|
While yes, they could look at some bugs people are reporting and compare it to the official builds; what they don't need to care nor worry about is upgrading the "public" from versions they didn't give them.
Nokia probably released several RC's to their beta testers, never bothering to get the NSU and stuff working for each of those versions until they got to a certain point in the testing cycle to actually warrant that work. There is no reason at all for Nokia to try and now go back and make sure the NSU updating is going to work for people who chose to beta test. Likely, their beta testers had to "flash" their devices.. so can the public if that's what they want to be.
![]() |
2010-05-04
, 19:40
|
Posts: 119 |
Thanked: 124 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Brazil
|
#56
|
So, outside of the predictable interference by saboteurs, I think this thread is going ok.
![]() |
2010-05-04
, 19:44
|
Posts: 415 |
Thanked: 732 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Finland
|
#57
|
![]() |
2010-05-04
, 19:44
|
Posts: 118 |
Thanked: 80 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#58
|
![]() |
2010-05-04
, 19:47
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#59
|
![]() |
2010-05-04
, 19:51
|
Posts: 118 |
Thanked: 80 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#60
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jaco2k For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
poo poo 1.2, pr 1.2, why am i here? |
|
but i installed that months ago OTA
and now its telling me i have to use NSU to install this?
very strange
born to rage against them