Im new to all this though i have been following this and the other threads from the beginning what id like to know is if pr 1.2 was good enough to release on the hong kong version of the n900 why isnt it good enough for us yeah I know theres talk of bugs but are we to believe that the hong kong version has these bugs too i know there is no fm transmitter included in the hong kong version so whats is the deference between ours and theirs sorry in advance if this is a stupid question or has been asked and answered before.
Im new to all this though i have been following this and the other threads from the beginning what id like to know is if pr 1.2 was good enough to release on the hong kong version of the n900 why isnt it good enough for us yeah I know theres talk of bugs but are we to believe that the hong kong version has these bugs too i know there is no fm transmitter included in the hong kong version so whats is the deference between ours and theirs sorry in advance if this is a stupid question or has been asked and answered before.
It is not a good policy - PR1.1.1 has some annoying bugs which irritate users each day. For exam - rendering blocking by some video file with unsupported codec. After you put that video to N900 you can't use system media player anymore for video, even for video shots from camera. So, two month delay could be acceptable but three months delay up to the end of May - definitely not.
