it seems to work! i mean it did not screw up my phone, and after sending an sms it appeared in the conversations thread.
but it didn't show conversations thread updated, i mean the thread didn't appear in the top of the list!
i think the reason is that the thread was already there(old sms)!
btw great work, i hope to see more update soon
I don't have a bugzilla account so thought I'd write here instead.
I have just installed the latest version, picked a number from contacts that started 07, wrote a message and sent it. I then got a warning telling me that numbers starting 07 need to be at least 11 digits. The number definately was 11 digits because I got it from my address book (I counted the digits too).
I then went back to try and delete some numbers from the "to" field but pressing backspace deletes from the message window. To was definately selected because the onscreen keyboard popped up displaying the number.
Is it possible to add ' to the 1 key too? I like to use correct punctuation where possible
Edit: It's not possible to type a number in manually or edit it at all!
**sigh** I wish people would read the feature request page... Could you add a link to the first post ossipena?
BTW, T9 is proprietary, so it will most likely never be added. On the other hand, predictive text algorithms are a different story. In fact... one user has already written a crude implementation.
I add this and direct link for reporting form to the first post now
e: and there shouldn't be too much of a risk with the db, but it is not 100% proof so if rtcom-eventlogger writes stuff at the same time, db might get corrupted. I am thinking about doing the hard way and use the api meant for that. but it might take a LOT time... so if someone knows how to do it (know all the necessary info obivously because db write works but lack info how to do it via api. I am getting segmentation fault with my tries currently) please pm or post to vertsms thread in development -section.
and api sends some dbus signals too what my sqlite function lacks so that probably is the reason why things don't get updated right away.
But actually reading the thread would prevent duplicate requests...
OK, I see what you mean. I thought you were referring to my post, but I had read all of the thread and my feedback was not duplicated which is where my confusion came from. I see now that you were referring to the T9 post(s).
