Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    How do I resolve version conflicts in autobuilder?

    Reply
    aspidites | # 1 | 2010-05-08, 09:03 | Report

    I'm recently developed a new version of aptly and changed the version scheme in the process. Before I was using a date-based version scheme:
    yyyy-mm-dd

    But I've changed to a number based scheme:
    2.0a3

    How do I request that the old version be removed so that autobuild doesn't auto-fail?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    qwerty12 | # 2 | 2010-05-08, 09:09 | Report

    You can ask X-Fade to have it removed.
    If all else fails, you can always use an epoch...

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to qwerty12 For This Useful Post:
    aspidites

     
    aspidites | # 3 | 2010-05-08, 10:06 | Report

    Doing it the other way around. Trying epoch first, then I'll bug X-Fade.

    Still no reply from X-Fade and epochs break autobuilder (at least when using py2deb), So I'm just going to have to use my old naming scheme.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by aspidites; 2010-05-09 at 14:42.

     
    Graham Cobb | # 4 | 2010-05-09, 16:12 | Report

    Originally Posted by aspidites View Post
    Still no reply from X-Fade and epochs break autobuilder (at least when using py2deb)
    Just FYI... Epochs definitely work in the autobuilder for normal packages: maybe it is a py2deb restriction.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by Graham Cobb; 2010-05-09 at 16:12. Reason: Poor quoting

     
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout