Active Topics
-
How many of you still use N900 as main phone? (592)
to Community by bradvesp - 2 hrs, 25 mins ago -
Which is the best N95? What software modifications could be made to it? (3)
to General by Kalatti - 12 hrs, 6 mins ago -
Installing CSSU Stable in year 2024 (2)
to Maemo 5 / Fremantle by teroyk - 19 hrs, 35 mins ago -
Porting apps to Leste (34)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Arno_11 - 1 day, 5 hrs ago -
[ANNOUNCE] CSSU-thumb thread - stable Thumb2 on N900 (2,266)
to Maemo 5 / Fremantle by pali - 2 days, 21 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (7)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 3 days, 1 hr ago - more...
 |
|
2010-05-11
, 13:08
|
|
Posts: 334 |
Thanked: 171 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#12
|
Fantastic job mate!
I also found Opera Mobile really fast. The virtual keyboard also is a huge plus.
It would be nice if you could also put Tear and Google Chrome in those tests (just for the numbers).
I also found Opera Mobile really fast. The virtual keyboard also is a huge plus.
It would be nice if you could also put Tear and Google Chrome in those tests (just for the numbers).
| The Following User Says Thank You to giannoug For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-05-11
, 13:10
|
|
Posts: 87 |
Thanked: 277 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#13
|
Originally Posted by lostinmirkwood
Test was run in a fast WiFi network in a short time period. Each test was run twice and there was not big differences between the runs (<1 second).
One other thing,
I assume that this test was run on a consistent WiFi network,
and that each candidate test was carried out temporally close to one another.
Because it still seems odd, that the browser benchmark would show MicroB 35% faster; but average real world tests shows around 65-72% of the performance of other browsers.
Order:
MicroB, first run
Fennec, first run
Opera, first run
MicroB, second run
Fennec, second run
Opera, second run
|
|
2010-05-11
, 13:12
|
|
Posts: 103 |
Thanked: 120 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ London
|
#14
|
Originally Posted by ahockersten
I don't think you even need to try
Of course, I'm one of the guys doing the Opera port, so I'm obviously biased towards making Opera look better than the other browsers.
Firefox Mobile is hardly usable at all and after a little while playing with Opera Mobile even Micro-B pales in comparison.
If you manage to make a steady stream of small bug-fixes releases over the next few weeks, you'll be the heros of all Maemo users
 |
|
2010-05-11
, 13:12
|
|
Posts: 349 |
Thanked: 309 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ PS/IL
|
#15
|
Thanks for the useful comparison.
I though fennec 1.1 alpha was latest, where do i get 2.0?
I though fennec 1.1 alpha was latest, where do i get 2.0?
|
|
2010-05-11
, 13:14
|
|
Posts: 1,667 |
Thanked: 561 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#16
|
Opera certainly has the fastest start up of all three. I feel fennec has the most potential though
|
|
2010-05-11
, 13:14
|
|
Posts: 87 |
Thanked: 277 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#17
|
Originally Posted by Chrome
This is the version number the application manager shows.
Thanks for the useful comparison.
I though fennec 1.1 alpha was latest, where do i get 2.0?
 |
|
2010-05-11
, 13:16
|
|
Posts: 38 |
Thanked: 17 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Melbourne
|
#18
|
Also have a look at the Acid3 browser tests:
Acid3 is a test page from the Web Standards Project that checks how well a web browser follows certain selected elements from web standards, especially relating to the Document Object Model (DOM) and JavaScript.
The full Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3
The test itself can be found here: http://acid3.acidtests.org/
Acid3 is a test page from the Web Standards Project that checks how well a web browser follows certain selected elements from web standards, especially relating to the Document Object Model (DOM) and JavaScript.
The full Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3
The test itself can be found here: http://acid3.acidtests.org/
|
|
2010-05-11
, 13:16
|
|
Posts: 349 |
Thanked: 309 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ PS/IL
|
#19
|
Warning: Very stupid question:
Average:
Fennec: 7,56
Fennec Jit: 8,35
Opera Mobile: 8,74
MicroB: 12,01
Is highest or lowest result better?
Average:
Fennec: 7,56
Fennec Jit: 8,35
Opera Mobile: 8,74
MicroB: 12,01
Is highest or lowest result better?
|
|
2010-05-11
, 13:17
|
|
Posts: 87 |
Thanked: 277 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#20
|
Originally Posted by Chrome
There is not a stupid question. Lower is better as it says after headline.
Warning: Very stupid question:
Average:
Fennec: 7,56
Fennec Jit: 8,35
Opera Mobile: 8,74
MicroB: 12,01
Is highest or lowest result better?
| The Following User Says Thank You to Ministeri For This Useful Post: | ||
I assume that this test was run on a consistent WiFi network,
and that each candidate test was carried out temporally close to one another.
Because it still seems odd, that the browser benchmark would show MicroB 35% faster; but average real world tests shows around 65-72% of the performance of other browsers.