![]() |
2010-05-26
, 22:08
|
Posts: 264 |
Thanked: 90 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#32
|
![]() |
2010-05-28
, 19:12
|
|
Posts: 1,091 |
Thanked: 323 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ ~
|
#33
|
![]() |
2010-05-28
, 20:03
|
|
Posts: 156 |
Thanked: 26 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Scotland
|
#34
|
![]() |
2010-05-28
, 20:10
|
|
Posts: 1,366 |
Thanked: 1,185 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#35
|
![]() |
2010-05-28
, 20:15
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#36
|
don't trust the battery icon.. run this in xterm:
Code:lshal | grep percent
![]() |
2010-05-28
, 20:19
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#37
|
![]() |
2010-05-28
, 21:12
|
Posts: 41 |
Thanked: 39 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ ireland
|
#38
|
![]() |
2010-05-28
, 21:19
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#39
|
![]() |
2010-05-28
, 21:27
|
Posts: 322 |
Thanked: 305 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Espoo, Finland
|
#40
|
The IM services still suck the battery dry, but I think I got a good 25% or 30% more battery life than under similar conditions before 1.2.
Without IM clients running, I could easily get 24 hours before 1.2...I am interested to see if I get similar battery longevity as reported here without IM clients running.