![]() |
2007-08-16
, 17:44
|
Posts: 372 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#12
|
![]() |
2007-08-16
, 18:31
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#13
|
The market will of course decide what form factors are acceptable, but I'm convinced that if you get any bigger than the N800, most people will make the quantum leap to at least a small laptop. That seemed to be the consensus the last time we hashed this subject over.
I think Nokia researched this issue well.
![]() |
2007-08-16
, 18:59
|
Posts: 93 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Anywhere but here
|
#14
|
In May 2007, Intel told the world that they saw two markets for the UMPC. One, a higher-end market for professionals and productivity users. The other, a low-end market focused mainly on smaller, cheaper, less powerful entertainment and communication devices aimed at the consumer.
![]() |
2007-08-17
, 07:17
|
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Barcelona, Spain
|
#15
|
![]() |
2007-08-17
, 08:07
|
|
Posts: 248 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ MI, USA
|
#16
|
![]() |
2007-08-17
, 09:11
|
|
Posts: 304 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Barcelona, Spain
|
#17
|
![]() |
2007-08-17
, 09:38
|
|
Posts: 2,853 |
Thanked: 968 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#18
|
![]() |
2007-08-17
, 10:46
|
Posts: 372 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#19
|
SD69 is correct. Neither the n800 nor the Eee are UMPCs.
Ironicly enough though, by that definition, it almost sounds like the Eee and especially the ITTs (which considering their form factor and other things, really arnt *that* far off from being umpcs) are aiming towards that lower end umpc niche. Which no UMPC I've ever seen has gone for. For instance that everun umpc is priced at more than twice a n800 for the lowest end version, which kinda puts it in a different market than the n800, and thats before we take into account that fact that it runs xp.
![]() |
2007-08-17
, 11:03
|
|
Posts: 449 |
Thanked: 18 times |
Joined on Apr 2006
@ Eureka, CA
|
#20
|
Hi All,
So how do we define the market of the ITT? Must it be ALL of the following?
1) Run Linux
2) Be small and pocketable
3) Have a hi-res screen 800x480
4) Priced in the same region +- USD50 (?)
5) Not a phone
6) Have WIFI, BT ....?
Of course, one can see that if we define it too rigidly, we're expecting a clone of the ITT.
One can argue that the Everun is more expensive, but it is better in other aspects AND runs a ton more software. Is it only because it is more expensive that we claim it is not in the same target market? AND/OR should the OS (Windows, btw, it can run Linux as well) be something that would sway the market?
Let's hear your views....
Luke
If I'm needing a screen that large, the heck with price: I'm buying one of those little Sony Vaios.
If I want something more portable, and yet with a more useful screen than my phone, then I take the N800.
The market will of course decide what form factors are acceptable, but I'm convinced that if you get any bigger than the N800, most people will make the quantum leap to at least a small laptop. That seemed to be the consensus the last time we hashed this subject over.
I think Nokia researched this issue well.