Poll: Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!
Poll Options
Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!

Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 2 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#4291
Originally Posted by james8110 View Post
hi jak, i many command thru xterminal and sudo enabled. but end message always " you don't have enough free space in /var/cache/apt/archives/
cannot uninstall program too
please help me
 
Posts: 3,664 | Thanked: 1,529 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Hamilton, New Zealand
#4292
Which kernal has the lowest risk of reducing the life span of the CPU and less chance of frying the CPU and stable?

I am looking for minimum at 125Mhz, maximum 800Mhz.
Any suggestion?
 
Posts: 284 | Thanked: 320 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Peterborough, UK
#4293
Is there any way to use avoid_frequencies with the conservative governor? I have modified the kernel-config script to handle sampling_down_factor, freq_step and down_threshold but have so far hit a brick wall when it comes to leaving out 250 and 950Mhz. I think the file is created within the kernel itself when running ondemand governor as even as root in xterm, it doesn't work if I try within the conservative cpufreq directory.
 
Parlapipas's Avatar
Posts: 223 | Thanked: 135 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Wish I was in Greece
#4294
Originally Posted by titan View Post
Three more positive votes are required for the promotion of kernel-power-settings to extras
http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...settings/0.11/
Please follow the QA checklist http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing/QA_Checklist for voting.
Done.........although it seems like half a dozen people beat me to it
 
Posts: 221 | Thanked: 51 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Germany
#4295
@titan - really happy with your kernel - BUT (now having an iPad) using JoikuSpot (always typing "modprobe JoikuSpot_Bouncer" & "modprobe -r JoikuSpot_Bouncer") drives me a bit crazy.
So anything you can do about this - cause it seems to work just fine using the stock (also PR1.2) kernel... any plans here?
 
hawaii's Avatar
Posts: 1,030 | Thanked: 792 times | Joined on Jun 2009
#4296
Add the module into /etc/modules or create an upstart script that does it for you.
 
Posts: 9 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#4297
I currently updated my device to PR1.2 and i reinstalled enhanced power settings and OCed my device to my preferred clocks.. everything seems to work great except my device seems to only use 125mhz 500mhz and 750mhz.. I belive before the update the device seemed to use all the frequencies between 125-750mhz...

here is my 24/7 settings..

15# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - CREATE A COPY OF IT FOR CUSTOMIZATION
# minimum frequency to use
MINFREQ=125
# maximum frequency to use
MAXFREQ=750
# list of frequency configurations: each "frequency:volt,dsprate"
FREQS="0:20,90 125:25,90 250:25,180 500:30,360 550:33,400 600:38,430 700:45,430 750:45,430 805:48,430 850:48,500 900:54,500 950:54,500 1000:60,500 1100:72,520 1150:72,520"
UP_THRESHOLD=75
SAMPLING_RATE=150000
SMARTREFLEX_VDD1=0
SMARTREFLEX_VDD2=0
IGNORE_NICE_LOAD=0

Please let me know if i am missing anything here.. thanks..

Last edited by suphiceto; 2010-05-31 at 17:43.
 
Posts: 254 | Thanked: 94 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ New Delhi, India
#4298
Originally Posted by navsin View Post
I have asked this earlier too.... I'm running v36 with PR 1.2 on ideal settings 500 - 850. The problem is when I use the phone app, the lower limit of the frequency automatically changes to 125 even though avoid frequencies still mention 125 and 250. I want to avoid this change in the lower freq.... Please help.
Someone please help me with this one.... I haven't come across any solution.
 
Posts: 946 | Thanked: 1,650 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Germany
#4299
Originally Posted by navsin View Post
Someone please help me with this one.... I haven't come across any solution.
there is no solution but only a builtin workaround
http://wiki.maemo.org/Overclocking#A...tion_and_hints
 

The Following User Says Thank You to titan For This Useful Post:
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#4300
Originally Posted by maxximuscool View Post
Which kernal has the lowest risk of reducing the life span of the CPU and less chance of frying the CPU and stable?

I am looking for minimum at 125Mhz, maximum 800Mhz.
Any suggestion?
The most recent Titan Kernel.
 
Reply

Tags
cooking on gas, cortex-a8, faster, first to fry it wins!, hardware, its smoking, n900, need for speed, need for weed, nos, omap, omap3, omap3430, overclock, overclocking, soc, system-on-a-chip, the dogs, this thread got good!, vtec just kicked in y0!, warranty will be void, whooplah, zoom zoom

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18.