Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    Best Phones Comparison--> Conclusion: Disappointing hardware in N900!!!

    Reply
    Page 1 of 9 | 1   2     3   | Next | Last
    yodawg | # 1 | 2010-07-08, 02:02 | Report

    So after reading these articles and viewing these comparison pictures I am starting to feel disappointed and ticked off because the n900 is supposed to be the best that Nokia can offer and yet its has **** for hardware.

    All the other smart phones have 512mb ram
    We get just 256

    Our screens dont have retina or amoled technologies

    We dont get HDMI out or wireless dlna but just generic VGA

    Many other smartphones get wireless n speeds of 200mbps
    we get just 54mbps

    Many other smartphones have 1280x760 video resolution @ 30fps
    we have a lousy 800x400 resolution @ 20~fps

    Other smartphones are sleek, sharp and light,
    Our phones are bricks and heavy

    Other smartphones get better battery's and better battery life.
    We get virtually the worst battery life of all smart phones

    Other smartphone's graphics chip push almost 30 gpu triangles/s
    Our phones graphics chip pushs just 14 gpu triangles/s

    Please discuss ! thanks

    http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets...stats_v2.0.jpg

    http://alienbabeltech.com/main/?p=17125

    http://alienbabeltech.com/main/wp-co...recompari1.png

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by yodawg; 2010-07-08 at 02:17.
    The Following User Says Thank You to yodawg For This Useful Post:
    amipp

     
    stone17 | # 2 | 2010-07-08, 02:06 | Report

    Bogus. The N900 uba pwnz!
    If you dont like, dont buy it or sell it if you already got it.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to stone17 For This Useful Post:
    akaSM, longcat, maluka, RAZOR, zubai

     
    cfh11 | # 3 | 2010-07-08, 02:07 | Report

    /grabs popcorn

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to cfh11 For This Useful Post:
    akaSM, esthreel, RafaLL92, superg05, zubai

     
    Dr.Marcial | # 4 | 2010-07-08, 02:08 | Report

    it was best of best when it was desing and released :P back in december all those phones you compare with were non existant or in development

    plus I personally still prefer maemo to the other phones OS, look at the specs of the n8, they are top notch but they decided to go with symbian because meemo devices are going to be top top HW, nokia always has the best HW devices at least 6 months before everyone else does

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Dr.Marcial For This Useful Post:
    adrsuhen, akaSM, AlMehdi, andyfrommk, eMiL, GameboyRMH, liedekef, majesty, maluka, noipv4, ossipena, pycage, RAZOR, sachin007, zubai

     
    yodawg | # 5 | 2010-07-08, 02:12 | Report

    i got the n900 and like it but my friend basically dropped this argument on me today with these links and i didnt have any comebacks so im here to try to discuss this matter to gain knowledge

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    jer006 | # 6 | 2010-07-08, 02:17 | Report

    Hmm I dont know if I would say dissapointing.

    I will agree that the n900 could do with more physical memory than 256MB however on thinking about it in the 7 months I've owned mine I have not gotten an out of memory once! (there is virtual memory too which is slower but still it helps a lot...)

    256MB on the root fs however is somewhat restrictive even with the fixes put in for pr1.2, I have been down to 12kb as ovi store downloads into /var/tmp

    Retina display and amoled... I feel that retina display is a bit of a marketing gimmic, it is 640 x 960 and the N900 is 800 x 480. Its definately a higher resolution than the n900 but is it really that visible to the naked eye, my n900 looks pretty damn sharp to me, so is retina really that much better? As for amoled, I have heard reports that while it is brighter and sharper it is harder to read in bright sunshine - this is not a problem I ever have with the n900 which is great!

    Battery life for all smart phones seems on par with the n900, maybe the n900 is a little worse but I dont know I only have an n900...

    The form factor (brick) could be much better but its got a physical keyboard which is great, I wish it was thinner but I cannot really complain its not that bad at all for whats packed into it! Check out the motorola droid/milestone which is slimmer than the n900 and packs a keyboard however the keyboard from what you read sucks as the keys are all flat and its harder to type on! The droid also packs a larger screen at 3.7" which is what Nokia should have done for the N900 from the get go...

    In terms of processors it seems to be that this year has really been the year of the 1Ghz snapdragon processor, the N900 came out last november so it is somewhat dated now. However when you consider the OS it more than makes up for it, it is also still a pretty potent CPU with users reporting overclocking to around 1Ghz possible.

    There is definately room for improvement with the n900 and hopefully nokia takes all of this into consideration for the upcoming meego device.

    The problem with mobiles and electronics in general nowadays is that the minute you buy the latest device from any company, give it a week and it is old hat as some other company has come out with something bigger and better!

    I for one am still very happy with my n900 and find it is continually up to everything I throw at it...

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by jer006; 2010-07-08 at 02:20.
    The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to jer006 For This Useful Post:
    adhrie, adrsuhen, akaSM, AlMehdi, jnwi, Killahgold, liedekef, NokiaRocks, philh, pycage, RAZOR, sachin007

     
    qt4eva | # 7 | 2010-07-08, 02:19 | Report

    just tell them why they comparing 2010 phones to a 2009 phone. wait till the n9 come out then you can drop the bomb back at them.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to qt4eva For This Useful Post:
    akaSM

     
    jer006 | # 8 | 2010-07-08, 02:24 | Report

    Throw the capabilities back in their face i.e. how many other phones can you get to the x-terminal right out of the box. No rooting or jailbreaking required!

    Also look at extra's devel and testing and the great application that are developed, some of them are not mobile applications but full ports of linux desktop software - how many phones can run open office for example?

    Also the app stores that companies continually boast about, apps really fill holes in the capabilities of the devices. Until froyo (android 2.2) Maemo was the only device with build in flash, this meant you had the full web at your disposal unlike the iphone where you need an app to do pretty much anything online...

    The N900 is a mobile computer which can make phone calls...

    If thats not impressive then I dont know what is!

    Oh and lastly my n900 has 48GB of storage inside (32GB built in with a 16GB SD Micro installed) what other device bar a portable hard drive or an expensive USB key can boast that level of storage?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jer006 For This Useful Post:
    kulas, RAZOR

     
    yodawg | # 9 | 2010-07-08, 02:25 | Report

    its a great phone but this news kinda hit me hard and i needed to escape to my lair of maemo.org to gather my thoughts with my council (forum members) before beginning my verbal defensive assault on my colleague who challenged the n900 with these arguments

    its just that other companies are constantly improving and upgrading and releasing better technologies while the best thing nokia has is its flagship n900 which to the mainstream is a dud and is RAPIDLY losing steam both hardware wise and software wise without any support from the big N who is too busy trying to make more failures like the n97 with the n8/9
    with nokia it seems their motto should change from
    "connecting people" to
    "too little too late" or
    "our company execs stopped caring a while ago"

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by yodawg; 2010-07-08 at 02:28.
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to yodawg For This Useful Post:
    danramos, etuoyo

     
    maluka | # 10 | 2010-07-08, 02:27 | Report

    Originally Posted by yodawg View Post
    i got the n900 and like it but my friend basically dropped this argument on me today with these links and i didnt have any comebacks so im here to try to discuss this matter to gain knowledge
    I've had mine since November and at the time there was no Android or Apple phone that came close to it. A friend and I were upgrading at the same time and his Android phone which was the best Android at the time was outdated 3 months later. The N900 performed way better than it when launched.

    The long life of the N900 as the "top" Nokia device is due to bad business choices by Nokia. I would have preferred to see a second Maemo device ship within 6 months after the N900 but of course it didn't happen and now we have to wait for MeeGo.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to maluka For This Useful Post:
    ossipena, sachin007

     
    Page 1 of 9 | 1   2     3   | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout