|
|
2010-07-20
, 12:53
|
|
Posts: 1,258 |
Thanked: 672 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#12
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to shadowjk For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-07-20
, 12:54
|
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#13
|
Apple inspired theory:
You have pretty weak 3g signal (less than full bars), but strong 2g. When tethering you aren't holding your N900. When not tethering and talking on the N900, you're holding the N900 near the right (or bottom in portrait), dampening the 3g signal making it choppy.
|
|
2010-07-20
, 13:37
|
|
Posts: 1,258 |
Thanked: 672 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#14
|
|
|
2010-07-20
, 17:16
|
|
Posts: 515 |
Thanked: 259 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#15
|
Apple inspired theory:
You have pretty weak 3g signal (less than full bars), but strong 2g. When tethering you aren't holding your N900. When not tethering and talking on the N900, you're holding the N900 near the right (or bottom in portrait), dampening the 3g signal making it choppy.
That's what I thought too so I set my limits at 1100 1100. I normally do 250 900. At 1.1GHz it didn't make any difference.
What's odd is that on 3G I feel like I'm half-duplex vs full-duplex with 2G. I know that the N900 sometimes can't walk and chew gum but in this case everything's backwards.