Facebook doesn't require Flash 10 features. It only says it requires Flash 10 (due to the way Flash versioning works.. it's a force upgrade even if you don't use the new features).
The Flash version tweaking will not help if Flash 10.1 features are actually used. It only helps if it is a website that says it needs Flash 10 but doesn't use any Flash 10 features (essentially just a version check).
Well, as long as I cannot play them - or how do I get rid of the flash update field, pls tell me - I take it that FB needs Flash10.1 and that my N900 doesn't work properly.
Well, as long as I cannot play them - or how do I get rid of the flash update field, pls tell me - I take it that FB needs Flash10.1 and that my N900 doesn't work properly.
Use Tweak Flash ver & you will be able to play videos on FB without any upgrade error...
So when did Nokia state flash 10.1 wasn't coming to the N900? Before or after it was demonstrated running on a N900? Please enlighten us all.
I'm quite sure Nokia has never made a statement either way - don't be so quick to ask for enlightenment since you may not end up hearing whatever it is you want to hear.
There was a presentation made by ~Adobe~ where they had a demonstration of Flash 10.1 apparently running on the N900. Was it really 10.1? Who knows for sure. It could have been an animated GIF and none of us would know any different - such was the lack of visual proof in the video itself.
There was a presentation made by ~Adobe~ where they had a demonstration of Flash 10.1 apparently running on the N900. Was it really 10.1? Who knows for sure. It could have been an animated GIF and none of us would know any different - such was the lack of visual proof in the video itself.
I'm quite sure that it was a real version of Flash 10.1, Nokia is simply too lazy to optimize it for the N900.
I agree that Nokia would probably consider it if enough members here would bug them enough and also use more public connections like the press. Imagine a headline like "Nokia doesn't want to release Flash 10.1 so their other phones get sold better"
I'm quite sure Nokia has never made a statement either way - don't be so quick to ask for enlightenment since you may not end up hearing whatever it is you want to hear.
There was a presentation made by ~Adobe~ where they had a demonstration of Flash 10.1 apparently running on the N900. Was it really 10.1? Who knows for sure. It could have been an animated GIF and none of us would know any different - such was the lack of visual proof in the video itself.
But the video you show, clearly demonstrates Flash 10.1 on N900 ??? surely someone can make this happen in the community?
No one can. Adobe did it and will not release it unless Nokia pays them big bucks. So Adobe did a bunch of work porting Flash 10.1 to Maemo and is sitting on it. And they won't give it to us because they don't see us as the customer, but Nokia.
This is why Flash is bad. Not because Steve says so (he just wants it his way) but because when Adobe decides you aren't worth the effort, you get locked out of chunks of the web. It should absolutely NOT be like this.