Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    anyone else want "easy fedora"

    Reply
    Page 7 of 8 | Prev |   5     6   7   8   | Next
    gsever | # 61 | 2010-09-03, 16:01 | Report

    Any luck on getting X running that chroot'ed Fedora?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    extendedping | # 62 | 2010-09-03, 17:52 | Report

    I have been fiddling with it on the colmmand line. It appears the arm porters did a not great work on fedora 12. for instance I have tried installing both some individual apps (err packages) and groups as well using yum groupinstall. I have encountered "dependancy hell" (wasn't yum setup to alleviate that?) in both instances. too bad why would people half port something? perhaps there will be a better fedora 13 arm port in the future. I'd be suprised if there were any graphical things that wouldn't be better in quoles masterful easy debian at this point.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    gsever | # 63 | 2010-09-03, 18:06 | Report

    Half port is better than no port We shall announce the easy debian as king of all ports then

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    extendedping | # 64 | 2010-09-03, 18:49 | Report

    only when talking wine.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    kingoddball | # 65 | 2010-09-04, 01:05 | Report

    How fella's!

    Anyone got easy fedora running??

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    gsever | # 66 | 2010-09-04, 18:28 | Report

    ep should have an answer for that. Without X I don't see much use of it.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    qole | # 67 | 2010-09-05, 05:18 | Report

    My biggest complaint about Fedora ARM is the missing packages. It feels like they did it as an experiment, or a proof of concept, rather than a working distribution. Debian actually works, and most of the packages are there. Sometimes I forget how much work they've done on the Debian distro, and it takes something like the Fedora ARM distro to realise how amazing the Debian ARM system is.

    On the other hand, I'm disappointed that you're having so many troubles. That's really too bad.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to qole For This Useful Post:
    johnel, rebhana

     
    extendedping | # 68 | 2010-09-05, 14:44 | Report

    like for instance tring to install yum groupinstall Base fails.

    I agree it is a real shame. I also agree it makes you really apreciate debian for arm more. shame as again there really are enough differences to justify learning the 2 distros, and most production environments will use the fedora like commands.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    SimonGie | # 69 | 2010-09-06, 15:19 | Report

    Originally Posted by extendedping View Post
    like for instance tring to install yum groupinstall Base fails.

    I agree it is a real shame. I also agree it makes you really apreciate debian for arm more. shame as again there really are enough differences to justify learning the 2 distros, and most production environments will use the fedora like commands.
    You have to rebuild the database and then edit your repo files to get yum working.

    Make the repos look like this:

    fedora.repo
    Code:
    [fedora]
    name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch
    #mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.fedora-arm.wantstofly.org/?repo=fedora-$releasever&arch=$basearch
    baseurl=ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/fedora/pub/fedora/linux/releases/12/Everything/arm/os/Packages/
    enabled=1
    metadata_expire=7d
    gpgcheck=1
    gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$basearch
    
    [fedora-source]
    name=Fedora $releasever - Source
    failovermethod=priority
    baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/$releasever/Everything/source/SRPMS/
    #mirrorlist=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-source-$releasever&arch=$basearch
    enabled=0
    metadata_expire=7d
    gpgcheck=1
    gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-primary
    
    [fedora-arm-source]
    name=Fedora ARM $releasever - Source
    mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.fedora-arm.wantstofly.org/?repo=fedora-source-$releasever&arch=$basearch
    enabled=0
    metadata_expire=7d
    gpgcheck=1
    gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$basearch
    and fedora-updates.repo

    Code:
    [updates]
    name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - Updates
    #mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.fedora-arm.wantstofly.org/?repo=updates-released-f$releasever&arch=$basearch
    baseurl=ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/fedora/pub/fedora/linux/updates/12/arm/
    enabled=1
    gpgcheck=1
    gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$basearch
    
    [updates-source]
    name=Fedora $releasever - Updates Source
    failovermethod=priority
    #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/$releasever/SRPMS/
    mirrorlist=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-source-f$releasever&arch=$basearch
    enabled=0
    gpgcheck=1
    gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$basearch
    
    [updates-arm-source]
    name=Fedora ARM $releasever - Updates Source
    mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.fedora-arm.wantstofly.org/?repo=updates-released-source-f$releasever&arch=$basearch
    enabled=0
    gpgcheck=1
    gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$basearch

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to SimonGie For This Useful Post:
    qole

     
    extendedping | # 70 | 2010-09-06, 15:46 | Report

    quole already made a working you rootfs which I used, yum is working in it. If I do the steps you outline will it be any better? for instance can you do yum groupinstal Base?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 7 of 8 | Prev |   5     6   7   8   | Next
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout