Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    How bad will it be if Nokia isn't the first to release a MeeGo device?

    Reply
    Page 1 of 3 | 1   2     3   | Next
    TiagoTiago | # 1 | 2010-09-17, 19:41 | Report

    The other day i saw on TV (i think it was CNN or BBC news) in this electronics convention there was this tablet (closer in size to the infamous iPad) that ran MeeGo, it wasn't by Nokia; the stuff there hasn't been released to the general public yet though, but how bad would it be for Nokia if they aren't the ones introducing MeeGo to the public?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Stskeeps | # 2 | 2010-09-17, 19:44 | Report

    Not bad at all It would show MeeGo has interest by vendors and actually, as advertised, is open

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post:
    cfh11, imperiallight, Jaffa, juise-, Näky, quipper8, tissot, ysss

     
    wmarone | # 3 | 2010-09-17, 19:45 | Report

    They were probably discussing the WeTab, which is apparently the first device to be released running MeeGo. They had it on stage at IDF on Tuesday, and at the MeeGo Developer Day. Said tablet is on sale to people in Germany at least.

    This has no bearing or impact on Nokia, in fact a 3rd party picking up MeeGo is only good for the platform as a whole. MeeGo itself will largely be invisible to end-users, with the hardware vendor providing the user interface that is seen on devices.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post:
    Näky, tissot

     
    johnel | # 4 | 2010-09-17, 19:46 | Report

    If it was an Atom-based cpu then Intels version is much further on than Nokia's implementation.

    Which is no surprise considering Intel started Meego way before Nokia.

    I thought Nokia weren't interested in tablet computers - they want to concentrate on mobile phone devices.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    gmuslera | # 5 | 2010-09-17, 19:48 | Report

    Not being the first means end user experience feedback before releasing the final product. Of course, if WePad deliver a very poor user experience because problems of their own, not from Meego itself, could give a perceived disadvantage whatever brings Nokia after.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    timoph | # 6 | 2010-09-17, 19:54 | Report

    Originally Posted by johnel View Post
    If it was an Atom-based cpu then Intels version is much further on than Nokia's implementation.
    There's only one MeeGo. Vendor customizations are a completely different thing.

    Originally Posted by johnel View Post
    Which is no surprise considering Intel started Meego way before Nokia.
    I'm pretty sure they started at the same time since Meego is a joined effort and didn't exist before LF, Nokia, Intel & co. joined forces to create it.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to timoph For This Useful Post:
    Jaffa

     
    TiagoTiago | # 7 | 2010-09-17, 19:57 | Report

    I was expecting Nokia to strongly associate their image to MeeGo, releasing a flagship product running it to boost MeeGo's image, perhaps even launching a whole line of devices runing MeeGo, a netbook/tablet computer, a NIT, a cell phone, a gaming device etc

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    tissot | # 8 | 2010-09-17, 19:57 | Report

    Like said above it would be great for us and for Intel/Nokia if other manufacturers are jumping in and i don't think it's anything out from Nokia, quite the opposite.

    MeeGo handheld UX as far as the big success goes will more than probably all on Nokia's shoulders.
    For tablets i hope we see great variety of manufacturers. Hopefully Nokia too in the next ~5 months time as they are probably the most MeeGo locked manufacturer that will have future and current services and "in-house" apps made for it.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    johnel | # 9 | 2010-09-17, 19:58 | Report

    Originally Posted by timoph View Post
    There's only one MeeGo. Vendor customizations are a completely different thing.



    I'm pretty sure they started at the same time since Meego is a joined effort and didn't exist before LF, Nokia, Intel & co. joined forces to create it.
    I was under the assumption that Meego used to be called Moblin - which Intel were involved in?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    wmarone | # 10 | 2010-09-17, 19:59 | Report

    Originally Posted by johnel View Post
    I was under the assumption that Meego used to be called Moblin - which Intel were involved in?
    Moblin was Intel's custom netbook-oriented distribution. MeeGo is basically a mixture of some technologies from each with Qt as the primary UI toolkit. And unlike Moblin, MeeGo belongs to the Linux Foundation and not Intel.

    All the interesting things seem to be happening under Tablet and Handset development, as the Netbook stuff just looks mostly like Moblin (but not completely.)

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 1 of 3 | 1   2     3   | Next
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout