|
2010-10-04
, 20:07
|
Posts: 452 |
Thanked: 522 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#3
|
i'm rather surprised that the pictures in this document say "N00" on the device :O
is there a reason for that?
|
2010-10-04
, 20:09
|
Posts: 1,141 |
Thanked: 781 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Magical Unicorn Land
|
#4
|
|
2010-10-04
, 20:22
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#5
|
|
2010-10-04
, 20:35
|
|
Posts: 1,391 |
Thanked: 4,272 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#6
|
|
2010-10-04
, 21:13
|
|
Posts: 115 |
Thanked: 43 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ UK, London
|
#7
|
|
2010-10-04
, 23:14
|
Posts: 1,141 |
Thanked: 781 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Magical Unicorn Land
|
#8
|
The Following User Says Thank You to stlpaul For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-04
, 23:52
|
Posts: 245 |
Thanked: 233 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Ljubljana, Slovenia
|
#9
|
i'm rather surprised that the pictures in this document say "N00" on the device :O
is there a reason for that?
|
2010-10-05
, 00:20
|
|
Posts: 551 |
Thanked: 507 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ North West England
|
#10
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JohnLF For This Useful Post: | ||
Every so often I peruse the FCC DB , and I ran into this
LJPRX-51X - Dated 5/24/2010 the original Nokia n900 hit the DB in Aug 2009.
Anyone know what the differences are? I didn't see anything obvious; maybe just a internal refresh. The manual looked the same.
Interesting that they would bring the refresh to the USA if they were planning on discontinuing it.... Maybe a Meego based n900?
Nathan