Posts: 490 | Thanked: 191 times | Joined on May 2010
#21
Originally Posted by maxximuscool View Post
Snapdragon doesn't have GPU on the dice. But android OS doesn't do multi tasking and CPU will be free to work on video processing not to mention 578MB RAM

Yes, it does. Even iphone's os is multi-tasking. Every big OS has services/daemons that run in the background.
 
Posts: 182 | Thanked: 69 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Netherlands
#22
Originally Posted by maxximuscool View Post
[...]
Sony Satio has the same hardware as N900 and yet it doesn't even do HD and taking picture with it at full resolution tooks like 10seconds to processed the image.
Samsung I8910 has the same hardware as well, and with the latest custom firmware (using the SE Vivaz codec) it records HD video at 25fps pretty well.
 
Posts: 182 | Thanked: 69 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Netherlands
#23
Originally Posted by ossipena View Post
what I have read about the issue, the bottleneck probably is the bus between camera and cpu,gpu etc. wasn't it the same issue with n8x0s? hardware was capable for better video output but the bus was totally undersized for such functionality.

e: and ps.
raw video would be the easiest job for every component
You might be right. But what I remember from an earlier thread (that I can't find now) is that the stuttering occurs at around 4000kbps, and that using a fast, clean memory card seems to help, to some extent. So that would point to file system issues.
 
Posts: 395 | Thanked: 165 times | Joined on May 2010 @ TMO
#24
Originally Posted by maxximuscool View Post
depending on what you meant by better. TI is better than Qualcomm yes. Snapdragon is still better than whatever OMAP3430. True, n900 can overclocking to the same spec but Mhz is not everything. The processor is not natively running at the Mhz level is not the same the processor running at native frequency. Otherwise why would they made OMAP35xx or OMAP36XX if overclocking cpu can hit the Mhz and give out the same performance?

True that A8 is better than Snapdragon because of the GPU built inside A8. But the one in N900 is underpower in term of achieving 720p at 30pfs like Desire.

Snapdragon doesn't have GPU on the dice. But android OS doesn't do multi tasking and CPU will be free to work on video processing not to mention 578MB RAM
Clearly you need to research more. A simple google will tell you why you're absolutely wrong.
 
Posts: 3,664 | Thanked: 1,529 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Hamilton, New Zealand
#25
Originally Posted by rickysio View Post
Clearly you need to research more. A simple google will tell you why you're absolutely wrong.
Yes, I am wrong. I read it from somewhere before and it is said that it doesn't have DSP on the same dice. But After read it again i found that I am dead wrong.
http://www.arm.com/markets/mobile/qu...on-chipset.php


But there is no way to get 720p recording or play back to work with the N900 smoothly. Maemo5 just doesn't have the spark of HD in it. MeeGo might have some future with HD if it ever coming to N900 by official.

I can see Samsung Omnia HD has the same hardware as the N900 and I accepted that it is pretty sad to see N900 falling behind in this area. Also N900 use up more RAM and seems to be struggle in image processing.

Only Nokia can fix this. Nokia closed apps and information doesn't really help us here to tackle the problem and find our own solution. Anyway, yeah
 
Posts: 1,258 | Thanked: 672 times | Joined on Mar 2009
#26
Originally Posted by Ignacius View Post
This is IMHO incorrect. The problem with the N900 not recording @720p is because of the software, not because the hardware. When the device access to the flash, it usually gets stalled, and this is a known problem with the Linux Kernel. The main problem is that Nokia most probably is not going to backport the patches to the N900's kernel, so we will have to wait for Harmattan.
This allegedly fixes a problem introduced "one year ago", which was probably after the N900 kernel ;-)
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:56.